Brooks C H, Smyth-Staruch K
Med Care. 1984 Aug;22(8):691-703. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198408000-00002.
A population-based, retrospective analysis of Medicare Part A and Blue Cross hospital insurance claims data was used to determine whether hospice home care cost savings to third-party insurers are substantial and result from the substitution of less expensive home care visits for more costly hospital inpatient days. The study was carried out by comparing the third-party payments of Cuyahoga County residents who died of cancer and were served by a hospice home care program (n = 152) with the insurance payments of cancer patients who never received hospice home care (n = 1,397). The data strongly supported the research hypothesis. The relative use of hospital days decreased more than 50% and the use of home care visits increased 10-fold when dying patients shifted from conventional care to hospice home care. This change in use represented a relative savings of about 40%, ranging from $1,089 per patient during the last 2 weeks of life to $2,676 per patient during the last 12 weeks of life. These results were not accounted for by group differences in age, type of cancer, or personal preference for home care.
基于人群的医疗保险A部分和蓝十字医院保险理赔数据的回顾性分析,用于确定临终关怀家庭护理对第三方保险公司的成本节约是否显著,以及是否源于用成本较低的家庭护理访视替代成本较高的医院住院天数。该研究通过比较库亚霍加县死于癌症并接受临终关怀家庭护理项目服务的居民(n = 152)的第三方支付情况,与从未接受临终关怀家庭护理的癌症患者(n = 1397)的保险支付情况来进行。数据有力地支持了研究假设。当临终患者从传统护理转向临终关怀家庭护理时,医院住院天数的相对使用量减少了50%以上,家庭护理访视的使用量增加了10倍。这种使用上的变化代表了约40%的相对节约,从生命最后2周每位患者节约1089美元到生命最后12周每位患者节约2676美元不等。这些结果不能用年龄、癌症类型或对家庭护理的个人偏好等组间差异来解释。