Sinha R C
Yale J Biol Med. 1983 Sep-Dec;56(5-6):737-43.
Evidence for and against the spiroplasmal etiology of aster yellows (AY) disease is examined. A spiroplasma, serologically identical to Spiroplasma citri, was cultivated by some workers from lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) plants claimed to be naturally infected with AY. The isolated spiroplasma was shown to be infectious by injecting Macrosteles fascifrons with the cultured organisms and then confining the injected leafhoppers on healthy plants. The reports claiming that a spiroplasma is the etiological agent of AY, however, exist only in astract form, and several essential questions still need to be answered to substantiate the claim. Evidence against the claim is based on significant differences that have been observed between the behavior of S. citri and the AY agent in the leafhoppers as well as in the plant. Also, helical organisms could not be found in AY-infected plants by either scanning or immunosorbent electron microscopy, and S. citri is serologically unrelated to the mycoplasma-like organisms found in AY-infected plants. These results strongly support the conclusion that the classical AY disease is not caused by a variant of S. citri.
本文对支持和反对翠菊黄化病(AY)由螺原体引起的证据进行了研究。一些研究人员从声称自然感染AY的生菜(Lactuca sativa L.)植株中培养出了一种与柑橘螺原体血清学相同的螺原体。通过将培养的微生物注射到束带长管蚜中,然后将注射后的叶蝉放置在健康植株上,结果表明分离出的螺原体具有传染性。然而,声称螺原体是AY病原体的报告仅以摘要形式存在,为证实这一说法,仍有几个关键问题需要解答。反对该说法的证据基于在叶蝉和植物中观察到的柑橘螺原体与AY病原体之间的显著差异。此外,通过扫描电子显微镜或免疫吸附电子显微镜,在感染AY的植物中均未发现螺旋状生物体,并且柑橘螺原体与在感染AY的植物中发现的类支原体生物体在血清学上无关。这些结果有力地支持了经典AY病不是由柑橘螺原体变种引起的这一结论。