Ewy G A
Ann Emerg Med. 1984 Sep;13(9 Pt 2):811-2. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(84)80445-x.
True asystole and electromechanical dissociation do not respond to electrical shock. Nevertheless there are anecdotal stories of physicians who, out of frustration, delivered defibrillation shocks to patients "in asystole" only to find that "defibrillation" resulted in the restoration of normal sinus rhythm. The explanation for this apparent paradox perhaps relates to our recent observation that ventricular fibrillation (VF) may masquerade as asystole if only one electrocardiographic (ECG) lead is monitored. We noted that in patients with atrial fibrillation, fibrillatory waves were often of very low amplitude or were not apparent in lead I, yet were obvious in lead VI. This suggests an anterior electrical vector in atrial fibrillation. To determine whether there was a dominant electrical vector in subjects in VF, 21 dogs were placed in VF and standard 12-lead ECGs were recorded at intervals. In two-thirds of the animals one lead showed no electrical activity (electrical asystole), while obvious VF was apparent in all the other leads. Thus, if only one lead is monitored, VF may masquerade as asystole. McDonald recently confirmed this phenomenon in man. Before one decides not to defibrillate a patient with an asystolic rhythm, one should quickly monitor another lead or change the monitoring electrode paddles 90 degrees to look at the electrical activity in a different plane.
真正的心脏停搏和电机械分离对电击无反应。然而,有一些轶事报道称,有些医生出于无奈,对“处于心脏停搏状态”的患者进行除颤电击,结果却发现“除颤”导致了正常窦性心律的恢复。这种明显矛盾现象的解释可能与我们最近的观察有关,即如果仅监测一个心电图(ECG)导联,室颤(VF)可能会伪装成心脏停搏。我们注意到,在房颤患者中,颤动波在I导联的幅度往往非常低或不明显,但在VI导联却很明显。这表明房颤存在前向电向量。为了确定室颤患者是否存在主导电向量,对21只狗诱发室颤,并定期记录标准12导联心电图。在三分之二的动物中,一个导联显示无电活动(电静止),而在所有其他导联中明显可见室颤。因此,如果仅监测一个导联,室颤可能会伪装成心脏停搏。麦克唐纳最近在人体中证实了这一现象。在决定不对心脏停搏节律的患者进行除颤之前,应迅速监测另一个导联或将监测电极板旋转90度,以观察不同平面的电活动。