Etchegoyen R H
Int J Psychoanal. 1983;64 ( Pt 4):445-59.
A detailed study is made of the paper Strachey presented at the British Society in 1933 and of his exposition at the Marienbad Congress, pointing out the similarities and the differences between them which mark an evolution in the outlook of this great English analyst. The influence on Strachey of 'Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego' and of the Salzburg Congress is easily recognizable, but what distinguishes his contribution is to have separated, with great theoretical precision, the fundamental instrument of analysis--interpretation--from suggestion. By defining the conditions in which the mutative effect takes place, while at the same time giving the reasons that make transferential interpretation the only field of this action. Strachey makes a lasting contribution to psychoanalysis and lays the foundations which, with the development of our knowledge, have made insight stand today at the centre of the most convincing explanations on the nature of psychoanalysis' therapeutic action.
本文对斯特雷奇1933年在英国精神分析学会上发表的论文以及他在玛丽恩巴德大会上的阐述进行了详细研究,指出了两者之间的异同,这些异同标志着这位伟大的英国精神分析学家观点的演变。《群体心理学与自我分析》以及萨尔茨堡大会对斯特雷奇的影响显而易见,但他的贡献在于以极高的理论精度,将精神分析的基本工具——诠释——与暗示区分开来。通过界定产生变化效果的条件,同时给出使移情诠释成为这一作用唯一领域的原因,斯特雷奇为精神分析做出了持久贡献,并奠定了基础。随着我们知识的发展,这些基础使洞察如今处于关于精神分析治疗作用本质的最具说服力解释的核心位置。