Suppr超能文献

二氢奎尼丁与丙吡胺对比:对慢性稳定性室性早搏患者的疗效

Dihydroquinidine versus disopyramide: efficacy in patients with chronic stable ventricular ectopy.

作者信息

Chimienti M, Panciroli C, Salerno J A, Regazzi-Bonora M, Previtali M, Cristiani D, Rondanelli R, Bobba P

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 1984 Oct;7(10):538-46. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960071005.

Abstract

Dihydroquinidine (DQ) is contained in substantial amounts in quinidine salts, but its direct antiarrhythmic action has not been studied. The efficacy of oral DQ (300 mg t. i. d.) compared to disopyramide (D) (200 mg t.i.d.) was thus investigated using a double-blind crossover placebo-controlled protocol in 12 patients, aged 13 to 67 years, with chronic stable high frequency premature ventricular beats (PVB), defined as greater than 100 PVB/h during 48-72-h control Holter monitoring. The protocol included three 72-h treatment periods: DQ, D, and placebo at random. On days 2 and 3 of each period a 24-h Holter recording was carried out; drug blood levels were determined at peak (days 2 and 3) and trough time (day 3). No significant difference in the mean PVB/h was found between control (735 +/- 400) and placebo periods (564 +/- 388), or between the two Holter recordings of each period. Compared to placebo both DQ (106 +/- 113, p less than 0.005) and D (240 +/- 263, p less than 0.05) reduced the mean PVB/h, but the decrease was significantly higher with DQ (78 versus 53%, p less than 0.02). Nine patients (75%) on DQ and 5 (42%) on D had a greater than 70% decrease in mean PVB/h; complex PVBs were abolished in 3 of 6 patients on both treatments. On day 3, DQ plasma levels were 1.31 +/- 0.44 (peak) and 0.92 +/- 0.45 (trough) mg/l; D plasma levels were 2.88 +/- 0.64 (peak) and 2.02 +/- 0.31 (trough) mg/l; no significant difference was found between day 2 and day 3 samples.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

双氢奎尼丁(DQ)在奎尼丁盐中含量丰富,但其直接抗心律失常作用尚未得到研究。因此,采用双盲交叉安慰剂对照方案,对12例年龄在13至67岁、患有慢性稳定型高频室性早搏(PVB)(定义为在48 - 72小时的对照动态心电图监测中,每小时PVB超过100次)的患者,研究口服DQ(300毫克,每日三次)与丙吡胺(D)(200毫克,每日三次)的疗效。该方案包括三个72小时的治疗期:随机给予DQ、D和安慰剂。在每个治疗期的第2天和第3天进行24小时动态心电图记录;在峰浓度(第2天和第3天)和谷浓度时间(第3天)测定药物血药浓度。在对照期(735±400)和安慰剂期(564±388)之间,以及每个治疗期的两次动态心电图记录之间,每小时平均PVB次数均未发现显著差异。与安慰剂相比,DQ(1,06±113,p<0.005)和D(240±263,p<0.05)均降低了每小时平均PVB次数,但DQ的降低幅度显著更高(78%对53%,p<0.02)。服用DQ的9例患者(75%)和服用D的5例患者(42%)每小时平均PVB次数减少超过70%;两种治疗方法均使6例患者中的3例复杂性PVB消失。在第3天,DQ血浆浓度为1.31±0.44(峰浓度)和0.92±0.45(谷浓度)毫克/升;D血浆浓度为2.88±0.64(峰浓度)和2.02±0.31(谷浓度)毫克/升;第2天和第3天的样本之间未发现显著差异。(摘要截短于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验