DiBianco R, Shabetai R, Silverman B D, Leier C V, Benotti J R
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 Nov;4(5):855-66. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80044-3.
A placebo-controlled study was employed to evaluate the effects of oral amrinone in patients with congestive heart failure. After a baseline period of at least 4 weeks of standard treatment for refractory congestive heart failure, oral amrinone was added to the treatment regimen of 173 patients. Patients were predominantly male (89%), aged 24 to 76 years (mean 54), with ischemic (52%) or idiopathic (37%) dilated cardiomyopathy, in New York Heart Association functional class II (40%), III (59%) and IV (1%) and having a mean (+/- standard deviation) left ventricular ejection fraction of 25 +/- 15%. Phase 1: After the addition of amrinone (113 +/- 33 mg three times daily), 52 patients (30%) showed a maximal increase in treadmill exercise time exceeding 2 minutes (Naughton protocol), 72 (42%) had a lesser increase, 24 (14%) developed limiting adverse reactions, 20 (12%) died and 5 dropped out of the study. Fifty-two "responders" (30%) who were free of limiting side effects and had a greater than 2 minute increase in exercise time were randomized in double-blind fashion to continued amrinone or switched to placebo (each plus standard treatment) for an additional 12 weeks. Phase 2: Comparison of 31 of these 52 responders who continued to receive amrinone with the remaining 21 randomized to placebo revealed no significant differences in vital signs, indexes of left ventricular size and function, systolic time intervals or maximal exercise time. Continued follow-up study of patients receiving either amrinone or placebo revealed decreases in exercise times of 7 and 10%, respectively (both p less than 0.05 compared with before randomization). Episodes of worsened congestive heart failure severe enough to mandate termination of double-blind treatment were as frequent in patients taking placebo (4[18%] of 21) as in those taking amrinone (4[13%] of 31; p = NS). The average symptom score and functional class of each treatment group remained comparable. Adverse effects such as gastrointestinal and central nervous system complaints were more common with amrinone treatment as were elevations of serum liver enzymes and reduced platelet counts. This large multicenter, randomized double-blind withdrawal study revealed no change in estimates of cardiac performance after the discontinuation of amrinone. These findings suggest that amrinone, in the dosages tested, does not importantly improve cardiac function beyond that provided by standard treatment with digoxin, diuretic drugs and vasodilators.
一项安慰剂对照研究用于评估口服氨力农对充血性心力衰竭患者的疗效。在对难治性充血性心力衰竭进行至少4周的标准治疗的基线期后,173例患者的治疗方案中加入了口服氨力农。患者以男性为主(89%),年龄在24至76岁之间(平均54岁),患有缺血性(52%)或特发性(37%)扩张型心肌病,纽约心脏协会心功能分级为Ⅱ级(40%)、Ⅲ级(59%)和Ⅳ级(1%),平均左心室射血分数为25±15%。第一阶段:加入氨力农(113±33mg,每日3次)后,52例患者(30%)的平板运动时间最大增加超过2分钟(诺顿方案),72例(42%)增加较少,24例(14%)出现限制性不良反应,20例(12%)死亡,5例退出研究。52例“反应者”(30%)无限制性副作用且运动时间增加超过2分钟,以双盲方式随机分为继续使用氨力农或换用安慰剂(均加标准治疗),再治疗12周。第二阶段:比较这52例反应者中继续接受氨力农治疗的31例与随机接受安慰剂治疗的其余21例,发现生命体征、左心室大小和功能指标、收缩期时间间期或最大运动时间无显著差异。对接受氨力农或安慰剂治疗的患者继续进行随访研究发现,运动时间分别下降了7%和10%(与随机分组前相比,两者p均小于0.05)。严重到足以要求终止双盲治疗的充血性心力衰竭恶化发作在服用安慰剂的患者(21例中的4例[18%])和服用氨力农的患者(31例中的4例[13%])中同样常见(p = 无显著性差异)。每个治疗组的平均症状评分和心功能分级保持相当。氨力农治疗时胃肠道和中枢神经系统不适等不良反应更常见,血清肝酶升高和血小板计数降低也更常见。这项大型多中心、随机双盲撤药研究表明,停用氨力农后心脏功能评估无变化。这些发现提示,在所测试的剂量下,氨力农除了地高辛、利尿药和血管扩张剂的标准治疗所提供的功能外,对心脏功能无重要改善作用。