Fehring R J
Nurs Res. 1983 Nov-Dec;32(6):362-6.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of Benson's relaxation technique (BRT) with Benson's technique augmented with GSR biofeedback (i.e., biofeedback-aided relaxation, BAR) on the psychological stress symptoms of well college students. Seventy-eight normotensive college students were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the BRT group, the BAR group, and a control group. The BRT and BAR students were asked to practice their respective relaxation technique daily for an eight-week period. Pre- and postintervention, all subjects were administered a state-anxiety inventory and a profile-of-mood state (POMS) test. Posttest analysis indicated that the BAR group had significantly lower state anxiety and POMS than the BRT and control groups (p less than 0.05). It was evident from the results that BAR did augment BRT in lowering psychological stress symptoms. Part of the effectiveness was due to the expectation of relief on the part of the BAR group. It was recommended that nurses study the effects of BAR in clinical settings.
本研究的目的是比较本森放松疗法(BRT)与采用皮电生物反馈增强的本森疗法(即生物反馈辅助放松疗法,BAR)对健康大学生心理应激症状的影响。78名血压正常的大学生被随机分为三组:BRT组、BAR组和对照组。BRT组和BAR组的学生被要求在为期八周的时间里每天练习各自的放松疗法。在干预前后,所有受试者都接受了状态焦虑量表和情绪状态剖面图(POMS)测试。后测分析表明,BAR组的状态焦虑和POMS得分显著低于BRT组和对照组(p<0.05)。从结果中可以明显看出,BAR在降低心理应激症状方面确实增强了BRT的效果。部分效果归因于BAR组对缓解的期望。建议护士们研究BAR在临床环境中的效果。