Zimmerman R A, Grossman R I, Goldberg H I, Lynch R, Levine R, Samuel L
Neuroradiology. 1984;26(6):457-62. doi: 10.1007/BF00342681.
Sixty-nine patients with 91 separate abnormal findings were studied by both intra-arterial digital subtraction arteriography (ADSA) and conventional film screen subtraction arteriography (CFSA) in the same projection, with the same magnification. Digital subtraction arteriography has distinct advantages over CFSA in the form of reduced contrast utilization, better patient tolerance of arteriography because of reduced contrast concentration, superior contrast resolution, and rapid, on-line visualization of the abnormalities. Digital subtraction arteriography is limited by its availability in only a single plane, by decreased spatial resolution which affected the image quality for intracranial blood vessels at an image intensifier (I.I.) field of 12 inches, and by relatively limited field of view both intracranially and extracranially for I.I. fields of 6 and 9 inches.
69例患者共有91处不同的异常表现,对其均采用动脉内数字减影血管造影(ADSA)和传统的胶片屏减影血管造影(CFSA)在相同投照位、相同放大倍数下进行研究。数字减影血管造影与CFSA相比具有明显优势,表现为造影剂用量减少、由于造影剂浓度降低患者对血管造影的耐受性更好、造影分辨率更高以及能快速在线显示异常。数字减影血管造影也存在局限性,它只能在单一平面进行检查,空间分辨率降低影响了12英寸影像增强器(I.I.)视野下颅内血管的图像质量,并且对于6英寸和9英寸的I.I.视野,颅内和颅外的视野相对有限。