Weinstein M A, Pavlicek W A, Modic M T, Duchesneau P M
Radiology. 1983 Jun;147(3):717-24. doi: 10.1148/radiology.147.3.6342033.
Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA DSA) was compared with conventional film/screen angiography in 70 patients with suspected atherosclerotic disease or intracranial disease. It was found that, although the contrast detectability of IA DSA was superior to that of conventional angiography, its spatial resolution was not as great. In all 70 cases, however, the spatial resolution of IA DSA was satisfactory for diagnosis, and it is concluded that the increased spatial resolution of conventional angiography should be necessary only in rare circumstances. The main disadvantage of IA DSA is the smaller field size, and it has several advantages over conventional film/screen angiography: (a) it is safer, since less contrast material is needed to visualize large vessels; (b) costs are lower since the magnetic recording tape and hard copies result in a savings of between $45 and $140 per examination; and (c) there is less need for darkroom personnel and film storage.
在70例疑似动脉粥样硬化疾病或颅内疾病的患者中,对动脉内数字减影血管造影(IA DSA)与传统的胶片/屏片血管造影进行了比较。结果发现,尽管IA DSA的对比度可检测性优于传统血管造影,但其空间分辨率不如传统血管造影。然而,在所有70例病例中,IA DSA的空间分辨率对于诊断来说是令人满意的,并且得出结论,仅在极少数情况下才需要提高传统血管造影的空间分辨率。IA DSA的主要缺点是视野较小,与传统的胶片/屏片血管造影相比,它有几个优点:(a)更安全,因为显示大血管所需的造影剂较少;(b)成本较低,因为磁记录带和硬拷贝每次检查可节省45至140美元;(c)对暗室工作人员和胶片存储的需求较少。