Suppr超能文献

吡罗昔康与吲哚美辛治疗口腔手术后炎症的双盲评估

Double-blind evaluation of piroxicam and indomethacin in the treatment of inflammation following oral surgery.

作者信息

Ohnishi M, Kawai T, Ogawa N

出版信息

Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1983;6(3):259-65.

PMID:6391930
Abstract

A double-blind study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of piroxicam with that of indomethacin in the treatment of inflammation associated with oral surgery. Patients received either 20 mg of piroxicam once daily or 25 mg of indomethacin three times daily for 5 days. Evaluations included assessments of pain and other indices of inflammation (swelling, redness and temperature). A trend favoring piroxicam over indomethacin in the effect on individual symptoms was noted at both Day 3 and Day 6. In the overall evaluations of improvement and drug usefulness at the end of the study, the better performance of piroxicam was statistically significant (p less than 0.05). The incidence of side effects was low for both drugs; indomethacin tended to produce slightly more headaches. Piroxicam should prove highly useful for the treatment of various types of inflammatory conditions, including that produced by oral surgery.

摘要

进行了一项双盲研究,以比较吡罗昔康和吲哚美辛在治疗口腔手术相关炎症方面的疗效和安全性。患者接受每日一次20毫克吡罗昔康或每日三次25毫克吲哚美辛治疗,为期5天。评估包括对疼痛和其他炎症指标(肿胀、发红和温度)的评估。在第3天和第6天均观察到,在对个体症状的影响方面,吡罗昔康比吲哚美辛更具优势。在研究结束时对改善情况和药物效用的总体评估中,吡罗昔康的更佳表现具有统计学意义(p小于0.05)。两种药物的副作用发生率都很低;吲哚美辛往往会导致稍多的头痛。吡罗昔康在治疗各种类型的炎症性病症(包括口腔手术引起的炎症)方面应被证明非常有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验