Ohnishi M, Kawai T, Ogawa N
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1983;6(3):253-8.
Single doses of piroxicam (20 mg) and mefenamic acid (500 mg) were compared, double-blind, for analgesic effectiveness in the treatment of oral surgical pain in out-patients. Excluding placebo responders and patients with mild or no baseline pain, 118 cases (57 piroxicam, 61 mefenamic acid) were analyzed for efficacy. The treatments were statistically equivalent and highly effective; over 75% of patients in both groups reported a reduction of 2 points or more in pain severity. The percentage of patients reporting complete relief of severe pain was slightly higher for piroxicam, the onset of analgesic activity was equivalent, and side effects were infrequent (5%) and mild with both medications. Piroxicam was clearly efficacious in relieving post-exodontic pain. If these findings are confirmed in other painful conditions and safety on extended use is established, piroxicam should prove quite useful as a general analgesic for the treatment of a wide variety of painful conditions.
对门诊患者单次服用吡罗昔康(20毫克)和美芬那敏酸(500毫克)治疗口腔外科疼痛的镇痛效果进行了双盲比较。排除安慰剂反应者以及基线疼痛轻微或无疼痛的患者后,对118例患者(57例服用吡罗昔康,61例服用美芬那敏酸)进行了疗效分析。两种治疗在统计学上等效且高效;两组中超过75%的患者报告疼痛严重程度降低了2分或更多。报告严重疼痛完全缓解的患者百分比,吡罗昔康组略高,镇痛起效时间相当,两种药物的副作用都很少见(5%)且轻微。吡罗昔康在缓解拔牙后疼痛方面明显有效。如果这些发现在其他疼痛病症中得到证实,并且确定长期使用的安全性,那么吡罗昔康作为治疗多种疼痛病症的通用镇痛药应该会非常有用。