手工器械与超声器械在开放性龈下刮治中的效果比较
The effectiveness of hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation in open flap root planing.
作者信息
Hunter R K, O'Leary T J, Kafrawy A H
出版信息
J Periodontol. 1984 Dec;55(12):697-703. doi: 10.1902/jop.1984.55.12.697.
The primary purpose of the study was to determine if, with an open flap approach, ultrasonic or hand instrumentation could remove all calculus from previously untreated teeth with moderate to severe loss of attachment. To be included in the study, teeth had to have at least 5 mm of attachment loss, be scheduled for extraction and be graded 2 or 3 on the Calculus Index of the Periodontal Disease Index system. Under local anesthesia, full-thickness, envelope-type flaps were elevated apical to the crest of bone to allow access to the root surfaces which were then treated with hand or ultrasonic instrumentation until the roots felt hard and smooth to a Hartzell explorer. The teeth were then removed, rinsed, and lightly scrubbed to remove debris and a No. 14 wheel bur was used to place a groove along the coronal extent of the connective tissue attachment. A stereomicroscope at magnification X 4.6 was used to quantitate the percentage of residual calculus on 25 teeth treated by each method. Overall, hand-scaled root surfaces demonstrated less residual calculus (5.78%) than ultrasonically treated surfaces (6.17%). Twenty teeth treated by each method were then prepared for histologic evaluation and evaluated under the light microscope at magnification X 100 for residual calculus and relative smoothness. Residual calculus was found on four ultrasonically and 12 hand-treated teeth and was almost evenly distributed between anterior and posterior teeth for both methods. The finding of considerably less calculus on histologic than on stereomicroscopic examination may have been due to the loosening of deposits by instrumentation, especially ultrasonic vibration, and their subsequent release during histologic preparation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
该研究的主要目的是确定采用开放瓣入路时,超声器械或手动器械能否从先前未经治疗、存在中度至重度附着丧失的牙齿上清除所有牙石。纳入该研究的牙齿必须有至少5毫米的附着丧失,计划予以拔除,且在牙周疾病指数系统的牙石指数上评为2级或3级。在局部麻醉下,在牙槽嵴顶上方掀起全厚的信封式瓣,以便暴露牙根表面,然后用手动或超声器械进行处理,直到用哈茨尔探针探测牙根时感觉坚硬且光滑。然后将牙齿拔除、冲洗,并轻轻刷洗以清除碎屑,用14号轮形车针沿结缔组织附着的冠方范围制备一条沟。使用放大倍数为X 4.6的体视显微镜对每种方法处理的25颗牙齿上的残留牙石百分比进行定量分析。总体而言,手动刮治的牙根表面残留牙石(5.78%)少于超声处理的表面(6.17%)。然后对每种方法处理的20颗牙齿进行组织学评估准备,并在放大倍数为X 100的光学显微镜下评估残留牙石和相对光滑度。在4颗超声处理的牙齿和12颗手动处理的牙齿上发现有残留牙石,两种方法在前牙和后牙上的分布几乎均匀。组织学检查发现的牙石比体视显微镜检查的少得多,这可能是由于器械操作,尤其是超声振动使沉积物松动,以及它们在组织学制备过程中随后被释放。(摘要截选至250字)