Pawlak J W, Pawlak K, Konopa J
Chem Biol Interact. 1983 Feb;43(2):151-73. doi: 10.1016/0009-2797(83)90093-5.
Earlier evidence, in Part I of this paper, has shown that cytotoxic and antitumor 1-nitroacridines did not primarily exert their potent inhibitory effects on cultured mammalian cells by physicochemical binding with DNA, although it undoubtedly occurred (Chem.-Biol. Interact., 43 (1983) 131). As a result it was investigated (i) whether 9-14C- or 1'-14C-labeled derivatives of their representative, 1-nitro-9-/3'-dimethylamino-n-propylamino/acridine (Ledakrin or Nitracrine), were capable of covalent binding with nucleic acids and other suitable macromolecules in target cells in vivo and/or (ii) whether activation of the agent in the cell was a necessary prerequisite for such binding. Using the criteria of resistance to exhaustive extractions with trichloroacetic acid and/or organic solvents, [14C]Ledakrin was found to bind covalently, with relatively little discrimination, with: (i) intracellular macromolecules, including DNA, of cultured tumor HeLa cells (370-2500 DNA base pairs/one Ledakrin molecule; (ii) experimental animal tumor Ehrlich ascites (Eat) cells in vivo (650-5880 DNA base pairs/one Ledakrin molecule); (iii) bacterial Bacillus subtilis SB 1058 cells (7000-33 000 Ledakrin links/one cell genome); (iv) NADPH-fortified rat liver homogenates in vitro (25.6 nmol/mg microsomal protein under air). These results far exceed the common levels reported for alkylating agents or chemical carcinogens. Unlike [ethyl-14C]quinacrine, compared in vitro, covalent macromolecules binding with Ledakrin in vitro, and most probably in vivo, can be equated to NADPH-dependent activation(s) by oxidoreductase systems and the presence of DNA alone was not satisfactory in itself to attain Ledakrin binding. Fractionation of the enzymatic digest of 14C-associated DNA, isolated from Eat cells exposed in vivo to [9-14C]Ledakrin, by Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography followed by mass spectrometry analyses of modified nucleosides, indicated that both mono- and dinucleosidical Ledakrin metabolites were the products of an in vivo reaction. This implied that the lethal reaction of the drug could be its cross-linking of the target macromolecules and/or its monofunctional attack on vitally important cellular components.
本文第一部分的早期证据表明,细胞毒性和抗肿瘤1-硝基吖啶对培养的哺乳动物细胞产生强大抑制作用,并非主要通过与DNA的物理化学结合,尽管这种结合无疑会发生(《化学-生物学相互作用》,43 (1983) 131)。因此,研究了:(i) 其代表性物质1-硝基-9-/β'-二甲基氨基-n-丙基氨基/吖啶(雷丹克林或尼曲吖啶)的9-14C-或1'-14C-标记衍生物是否能够在体内与靶细胞中的核酸和其他合适的大分子发生共价结合,和/或 (ii) 该药物在细胞内的活化是否是这种结合的必要前提条件。根据对三氯乙酸和/或有机溶剂彻底萃取的抗性标准,发现[14C]雷丹克林与以下物质发生共价结合,且区分度相对较小:(i) 培养的肿瘤海拉细胞的细胞内大分子,包括DNA(370 - 2500个DNA碱基对/一个雷丹克林分子);(ii) 实验动物肿瘤艾氏腹水(Eat)细胞(650 - 5880个DNA碱基对/一个雷丹克林分子);(iii) 细菌枯草芽孢杆菌SB 1058细胞(7000 - 33000个雷丹克林连接/一个细胞基因组);(iv) 体外经NADPH强化的大鼠肝匀浆(空气中25.6 nmol/mg微粒体蛋白)。这些结果远远超过了报道的烷基化剂或化学致癌物的常见水平。与体外比较的[乙基-14C]喹吖因不同,雷丹克林在体外以及很可能在体内与共价大分子的结合,可以等同于氧化还原酶系统的NADPH依赖性活化,仅DNA的存在本身不足以实现雷丹克林的结合。对从体内暴露于[9-14C]雷丹克林的Eat细胞中分离的14C相关DNA的酶消化物进行Sephadex LH-20柱色谱分离,随后对修饰核苷进行质谱分析,表明单核苷和二核苷形式的雷丹克林代谢物都是体内反应的产物。这意味着该药物的致死反应可能是其对靶大分子的交联和/或对至关重要的细胞成分的单功能攻击。