Branconnier R J, Cole J O, Ghazvinian S, Spera K F, Oxenkrug G F, Bass J L
J Clin Psychiatry. 1983 May;44(5 Pt 2):130-3.
The clinical efficacy and adverse reaction profile of bupropion, an atypical antidepressant, was compared with the tricyclic imipramine in 63 elderly depressives. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 150 or 450 mg/day of bupropion, 150 mg/day of imipramine, or placebo for 35 days. Both doses of bupropion were equivalent to imipramine in antidepressant efficacy. The higher dose of bupropion had a more rapid onset of effect than the low dose and significantly greater anxiolytic activity than either imipramine or the lower dose. Both doses of bupropion had adverse reaction profiles strikingly similar to placebo and, in marked contrast to imipramine, did not produce sedation or anticholinergic side effects. Cognition improved equally in all groups. It was concluded that bupropion has therapeutic advantages over the tricyclics in the treatment of elderly depressives.
在63名老年抑郁症患者中,对一种非典型抗抑郁药安非他酮的临床疗效及不良反应情况与三环类药物丙咪嗪进行了比较。患者被随机分配接受每日150毫克或450毫克安非他酮、每日150毫克丙咪嗪或安慰剂治疗,为期35天。两种剂量的安非他酮在抗抑郁疗效上与丙咪嗪相当。安非他酮的高剂量组起效比低剂量组更快,且抗焦虑活性显著高于丙咪嗪或低剂量组。两种剂量的安非他酮的不良反应情况与安慰剂极为相似,与丙咪嗪形成显著对比的是,它不会产生镇静作用或抗胆碱能副作用。所有组的认知功能均有同等程度改善。得出的结论是,在治疗老年抑郁症方面,安非他酮比三环类药物具有治疗优势。