Suppr超能文献

一种为择期手术进行交叉配血的合理方法。

A rational approach to crossmatching blood for elective surgery.

作者信息

Dodds A J, Pun A, Isbister J P, Ting A, Klarkowski D, Concannon A J, Biggs J C

出版信息

Anaesth Intensive Care. 1983 Feb;11(1):16-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8301100103.

Abstract

A group-and-screen system was introduced for selected surgical procedures to improve the cost-effectiveness of the hospital blood transfusion service. The mean crossmatch-transfusion ratio for eleven procedures was 11.1 but fell to 3.3 after the change. The overall crossmatch-transfusion ratio in the hospital improved from 2.7 to 2.2 (p less than 0.001) and blood wastage by expiry fell from 12% to 5% (p less than 0.02). The mean age of blood being transfused also improved slightly from 12.3 days to 10.4 days (p less than 0.001). No problems have arisen from the group-and-screen system to date. It has led to improvement in the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the hospital blood bank and resulted in fresher blood being transfused.

摘要

为了提高医院输血服务的成本效益,针对某些特定的外科手术引入了一种血型分组和筛查系统。11种手术的平均交叉配血-输血比例为11.1,但在采用该系统后降至3.3。医院的总体交叉配血-输血比例从2.7提高到了2.2(p<0.001),过期血液浪费率从12%降至5%(p<0.02)。所输血液的平均保存时间也略有缩短,从12.3天降至10.4天(p<0.001)。迄今为止,血型分组和筛查系统未出现任何问题。它提高了医院血库的效率和成本效益,使所输血液更加新鲜。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验