Drawz G, Heise H, Drawz B, Jentzen H, Hoffmann L
Rofo. 1983 Jun;138(6):736-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1055819.
69 years after the introduction of x-ray examination of the seminal duct, the indication and contraindication are reviewed according to current interdisciplinary aspects, basing on 31 cases studied over a period of two years. The procedure followed in the roentgenological visualization of carcinoma of the prostate is generally recognized, whereas controversial opinions are held with regard to patients with occlusive azoospermia. The possibility of lesions and damage caused by some contrast media is an established fact. Differences in the lumen of the ductus epididymidis prevented complete visualization of the epididymis when using the previous, highly concentrated, sticky contrast media which were insoluble in water. These drawbacks have been eliminated by Amipaque. Today epididymograms are no longer considered necessary, although there are exceptions. Experience and a sophisticated technique are mandatory. If refertilization is envisaged, it is permissible during operation only to effect a descending x-ray for the purpose of clarifying the outflow conditions.
在输精管X线检查引入69年后,根据当前跨学科的观点,基于两年内研究的31例病例,对其适应症和禁忌症进行了回顾。前列腺癌的X线影像学检查所采用的程序已得到普遍认可,而对于梗阻性无精子症患者则存在争议。一些造影剂会造成病变和损伤,这已是既定事实。当使用先前的、高浓度的、粘性的、不溶于水的造影剂时,附睾管腔的差异会妨碍附睾的完整显影。阿米培克(Amipaque)已消除了这些缺点。如今,尽管存在例外情况,但附睾造影不再被认为是必要的。经验和精湛的技术是必不可少的。如果设想进行再生育,仅在手术期间为了明确流出情况而进行下行X线检查才是允许的。