Suppr超能文献

减少爽约率的预约提醒。对其成本效益的分层分析。

Appointment reminders to reduce no-show rates. A stratified analysis of their cost-effectiveness.

作者信息

Bigby J, Giblin J, Pappius E M, Goldman L

出版信息

JAMA. 1983 Oct 7;250(13):1742-5.

PMID:6411944
Abstract

To determine whether reminders are cost-effective for an adult primary care internal medicine center, we randomized 590 scheduled, follow-up appointments to no reminder, computer-generated letter reminders, and telephoned reminders. The no-show rate was reduced from 24% in the control group to 14% in the reminder groups, and letter and telephoned reminders were equally effective. An economic analysis showed that about two thirds of the savings realized from reminders was generated in 23% of the patients whose prior predicted probability of a no-show appointment was above 20%. However, in our primary care center, computer-generated letter reminders were estimated to be cost-effective whenever the probability of a no-show was above 5%, and telephoned or manual letter reminders were estimated to be cost-effective whenever the probability of a no-show was above about 11%. Based on our sensitivity analysis, telephoned or manual letter reminders should be cost-effective in many other ambulatory settings as well, although in some settings, reminders may be restricted to patients at high risk for no-show behavior.

摘要

为了确定提醒服务对成人初级保健内科中心是否具有成本效益,我们将590个预约的随访预约随机分为无提醒组、电脑生成信件提醒组和电话提醒组。失约率从对照组的24%降至提醒组的14%,信件提醒和电话提醒效果相同。经济分析表明,提醒服务节省的费用约三分之二来自23%先前预测失约概率高于20%的患者。然而,在我们的初级保健中心,当失约概率高于5%时,电脑生成信件提醒被估计具有成本效益;当失约概率高于约11%时,电话提醒或人工信件提醒被估计具有成本效益。基于我们的敏感性分析,电话提醒或人工信件提醒在许多其他门诊环境中也应具有成本效益,尽管在某些环境中,提醒服务可能仅限于失约行为风险较高的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验