Shepard D S, Moseley T A
Med Care. 1976 Mar;14(3):268-73. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197603000-00008.
This study compared mail, telephone, and control strategies to reduce the rate of broken appointments in a pediatric outpatient department. Based on 1,039 randomly assigned appointments, the mail strategy had a broken appointment rate of 29.1 per cent, the telephone strategy of 25.3 per cent, and the control of 44.2 per cent. Both strategies were significantly effective, but the difference between them was not significant. Patients without telephones had a higher rate of broken appointments than patients with telephones. Mailed reminders are the more cost-effective intervention.
本研究比较了邮件、电话和对照策略,以降低儿科门诊的失约率。基于1039个随机分配的预约,邮件策略的失约率为29.1%,电话策略为25.3%,对照为44.2%。两种策略均显著有效,但它们之间的差异不显著。没有电话的患者比有电话的患者失约率更高。邮寄提醒是更具成本效益的干预措施。