Tanganelli S, Bianchi C, Beani L
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1983 Sep;324(1):34-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00647835.
The acetylcholine (ACh) release was studied in superfused, electrically-stimulated slices of guinea-pig cerebral cortex. Muscimol and 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo (5-4-c)-pyridin-3-ol (THIP), as well as exogenous GABA, reduced the electrically-evoked ACh release and enhanced its spontaneous outflow. Picrotoxin antagonized these effects. In addition, picrotoxin and ethanolamine-O-sulphate (EOS) caused opposite changes in transmitter outflow, suggesting the existence of an exogenous GABAergic control on the cholinergic nerve endings. Neither flurazepam 6.6 X 10(-6)--3.3 X10(-5) mol/l nor diazepam 3.3 X 10(-6)--3.3 X 10(-5) mol/l by themselves affected ACh release. Diazepam prevented GABA-, muscimol- and EOS-induced changes in spontaneous and 1 Hz-evoked outflow. Ro 15-1788 3.3 X 10(*-6) mol/l abolished diazepam antagonism vs exogenous GABA. The ineffectiveness of flurazepam and diazepam on normal release (i.e. the lack of potentiation vs the endogenous GABAergic control) supports the view that "synaptic" GABA receptors acting upon the cholinergic nerve endings are not coupled with Benzodiazepine receptors. The unexpected diazepam antagonism vs exogenous GABA and GABA-like compounds can be explained with an unusual Diazepam negative cooperation with "extrasynaptic" GABA receptors, possibly present on the cholinergic terminals. Thus, the rule of benzodiazepine-GABA synergism does not seem always tenable, at least at certain pre-synaptic sites.
在豚鼠大脑皮层的灌流电刺激切片中研究了乙酰胆碱(ACh)的释放。蝇蕈醇和4,5,6,7 - 四氢异恶唑并[5,4 - c]吡啶 - 3 - 醇(THIP)以及外源性γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)可减少电诱发的ACh释放并增强其自发释放。印防己毒素可拮抗这些作用。此外,印防己毒素和乙醇胺 - O - 硫酸盐(EOS)引起递质释放的相反变化,提示在胆碱能神经末梢存在外源性GABA能控制。6.6×10⁻⁶ - 3.3×10⁻⁵mol/L的氟西泮和3.3×10⁻⁶ - 3.3×10⁻⁵mol/L的地西泮单独使用时均不影响ACh释放。地西泮可阻止GABA、蝇蕈醇和EOS诱导的自发释放及1Hz诱发释放的变化。3.3×10⁻⁶mol/L的Ro 15 - 1788可消除地西泮对外源性GABA的拮抗作用。氟西泮和地西泮对正常释放无效(即与内源性GABA能控制相比无增强作用)支持这样的观点,即作用于胆碱能神经末梢的“突触”GABA受体不与苯二氮䓬受体偶联。地西泮对外源性GABA和GABA样化合物的意外拮抗作用可用地西泮与可能存在于胆碱能终末上的“突触外”GABA受体的异常负协同作用来解释。因此,苯二氮䓬 - GABA协同作用规则似乎并非总是成立,至少在某些突触前部位是这样。