Venturoli S, Paradisi R, Fabbri R, Magrini O, Porcu E, Flamigni C
Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Jan;63(1):6-11.
Five infertile patients with polycystic ovarian disease were treated to induce ovulation with pure human urinary follicle-stimulating hormone and human menopausal gonadotropin consisting of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone in 1:1 ratio. No substantial differences were seen between the two types of treatment regarding plasma values of follicle-stimulating hormone, prolactin, testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, progesterone, and 17-hydroxyprogesterone. Estrone, estradiol, and androstenedione values were higher during human urinary follicle-stimulating hormone treatments. Luteinizing hormone levels dropped in both treatments, but the fall was greater during human urinary follicle-stimulating hormone. No real differences were observed concerning number of ovulations, length of treatments, and follicle-stimulating hormone amounts administered; no hyperstimulations were observed. These data do not confirm the observation that more controlled responses of the ovaries can be elicited when low luteinizing hormone gonadotropin preparations are used.
五名多囊卵巢疾病的不孕患者接受了治疗,使用纯人尿促卵泡激素和人绝经期促性腺激素(促卵泡激素和促黄体生成素比例为1:1)诱导排卵。在促卵泡激素、催乳素、睾酮、双氢睾酮、孕酮和17-羟孕酮的血浆值方面,两种治疗方法之间未观察到实质性差异。在人尿促卵泡激素治疗期间,雌酮、雌二醇和雄烯二酮值较高。两种治疗中促黄体生成素水平均下降,但在人尿促卵泡激素治疗期间下降幅度更大。在排卵次数、治疗时长和促卵泡激素给药量方面未观察到实际差异;未观察到过度刺激。这些数据并未证实以下观察结果:使用低促黄体生成素促性腺激素制剂时,卵巢能产生更可控的反应。