Stuart D R, Kotsanis C A, Borkenhagen R
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1983 Dec;91(6):632-7. doi: 10.1177/019459988309100608.
Two prostheses for voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy were compared. A comparison was also made to evaluate the interchangeability of the two prostheses (Panje button and Blom-Singer duckbill) when only a single tracheoesophageal fistula was made. Fourteen laryngectomized patients were included in the study. Factors taken into account were voice quality, intelligibility, surgical technique, ease of insertion of the prostheses, patient preference, and care of each device. It was concluded that the Panje button in a Blom-Singer fistula offered better results when voice quality was compared. Patient selectivity is a factor important to the high success rate reported for voice restoration when either prosthesis is used. The development and success of these new prostheses is highlighted in a brief review of the literature.
对两种喉切除术后语音康复假体进行了比较。还进行了一项比较，以评估在仅制作单个气管食管瘘时两种假体（潘杰按钮式和布隆-辛格鸭嘴式）的互换性。14例喉切除患者纳入本研究。考虑的因素包括语音质量、可懂度、手术技术、假体插入的难易程度、患者偏好以及每种装置的护理。得出的结论是，当比较语音质量时，布隆-辛格瘘管中的潘杰按钮式假体效果更好。患者的选择性是使用任何一种假体时语音恢复成功率高的一个重要因素。在对文献的简要回顾中强调了这些新假体的发展和成功。
