Suppr超能文献

“良性”单克隆丙种球蛋白病。这是个误称吗?

'Benign' monoclonal gammopathy. A misnomer?

作者信息

Kyle R A

出版信息

JAMA. 1984 Apr 13;251(14):1849-54.

PMID:6422066
Abstract

A series of 241 patients with monoclonal protein but no evidence of multiple myeloma, macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, or lymphoma (benign monoclonal gammopathy) were followed up for more than ten years. The patients were classified as follows: group 1, patients without increase of monoclonal serum protein during follow-up (benign) (37%); group 2, patients with greater than 50% increase of monoclonal protein or development of monoclonal urine protein (5%); group 3, patients who died of unrelated causes (39%); and group 4, patients in whom myeloma, macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, or related diseases developed (19%). The median interval from recognition of the monoclonal protein to diagnosis of multiple myeloma was 98 months; macroglobulinemia, 115 months; and systemic amyloidosis, 92 months. No laboratory or clinical data initially differentiated patients with benign gammopathy from those in whom serious diseases developed. Consequently, serial measurement of serum monoclonal protein is essential.

摘要

对241例患有单克隆蛋白但无多发性骨髓瘤、巨球蛋白血症、淀粉样变性或淋巴瘤证据(良性单克隆丙种球蛋白病)的患者进行了长达十多年的随访。患者分为以下几组:第1组,随访期间单克隆血清蛋白未增加的患者(良性)(37%);第2组,单克隆蛋白增加超过50%或出现单克隆尿蛋白的患者(5%);第3组,死于无关原因的患者(39%);第4组,发生骨髓瘤、巨球蛋白血症、淀粉样变性或相关疾病的患者(19%)。从识别单克隆蛋白到诊断多发性骨髓瘤的中位间隔时间为98个月;巨球蛋白血症为115个月;系统性淀粉样变性为92个月。最初,没有实验室或临床数据能够区分良性丙种球蛋白病患者和发生严重疾病的患者。因此,血清单克隆蛋白的系列测量至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验