Suppr超能文献

Comparative studies on different methods in typing strains of erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae. I. Methods and influence of some factors on their results.

作者信息

Wellmann G, Kucsera G, Nørrung V

出版信息

Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol. 1983 Mar;254(1):42-54.

PMID:6426191
Abstract

To contribute to the standardization of typing Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae strains the following points have been examined and compared: the usefulness of tube precipitation, paper chromatography and agar gel diffusion; different methods to produce good antisera (specific high titres) and antigens (CH3COOH-, HCl-extract, extraction by means of autoclavation). Rabbits have a considerably varying individual ability to produce Erysipelas antibodies with good precipitation titres. The antigenic effect of different E.rh.-strains and of dissociated forms is not equal. The density of bacteria suspension for extract production and for rabbit immunization has to be sufficient. The period of usability of extracts and antisera is different.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验