Suppr超能文献

Comparative studies on different methods in typing strains of erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae. I. Methods and influence of some factors on their results.

作者信息

Wellmann G, Kucsera G, Nørrung V

出版信息

Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol. 1983 Mar;254(1):42-54.

PMID:6426191
Abstract

To contribute to the standardization of typing Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae strains the following points have been examined and compared: the usefulness of tube precipitation, paper chromatography and agar gel diffusion; different methods to produce good antisera (specific high titres) and antigens (CH3COOH-, HCl-extract, extraction by means of autoclavation). Rabbits have a considerably varying individual ability to produce Erysipelas antibodies with good precipitation titres. The antigenic effect of different E.rh.-strains and of dissociated forms is not equal. The density of bacteria suspension for extract production and for rabbit immunization has to be sufficient. The period of usability of extracts and antisera is different.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验