Almond D J, King R F, Burkinshaw L, Oxby C B, McMahon M J
Br J Nutr. 1984 Sep;52(2):215-25. doi: 10.1079/bjn19840090.
Three methods of measuring changes in body fat were compared in seventeen patients undergoing a 2-week course of intravenous nutrition. Patients received all nutrition intravenously at a steady rate of infusion, calculated to supply energy at a rate equal to 1.5 times the resting metabolic expenditure measured before feeding. Fat change was estimated from measurements of skinfold thickness, by isotopic methods (neutron-activation analysis and dilution of tritiated water) and by daily analysis of expired gases. The mean (with 1 SEM) gain in fat over the 2-week period was 1.14 (0.30) kg for skinfold measurement, 0.53 (0.62) kg for isotopic determination and 1.29 (0.22) kg for expired-gas analysis. There were no significant differences between the mean gains in fat measured by the three methods. The results show that expired-gas analysis is the most sensitive technique, measuring change in fat content with an estimated precision of 0.26 kg. The isotopic method is less sensitive, with a precision of 2.38 kg, but provides a detailed description of body composition. In contrast to these highly-specialized techniques, both of which have limited application, the simple technique of measurement of skinfolds occupies an intermediate position of sensitivity, with a precision for measuring change in fat content of 0.85 kg, and also has the potential to measure total body fat content.
对17名接受为期2周静脉营养治疗的患者,比较了三种测量体脂变化的方法。患者以稳定的输注速率静脉接受所有营养,输注速率经计算可提供的能量速率等于喂食前测量的静息代谢消耗的1.5倍。通过测量皮褶厚度、采用同位素方法(中子活化分析和氚水稀释)以及每日分析呼出气体来估算脂肪变化。在为期2周的时间里,皮褶测量法测得的脂肪平均增加量(±1标准误)为1.14(0.30)kg,同位素测定法为0.53(0.62)kg,呼出气体分析法为1.29(0.22)kg。三种方法测得的脂肪平均增加量之间无显著差异。结果表明,呼出气体分析法是最敏感的技术,测量脂肪含量变化的估计精度为0.26 kg。同位素方法较不敏感,精度为2.38 kg,但能详细描述身体成分。与这两种应用有限的高度专业化技术不同,简单的皮褶测量技术在敏感性方面处于中间位置,测量脂肪含量变化的精度为0.85 kg,并且还有测量全身脂肪含量的潜力。