• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类新生儿的舌侧反射。

The lateral tongue reflex in human neonates.

作者信息

Derkson G D, Catalanotto F A

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1978 Feb;46(1):331-7. doi: 10.2466/pms.1978.46.1.331.

DOI:10.2466/pms.1978.46.1.331
PMID:643492
Abstract

We undertook an investigation of the lateral tongue reflex to determine whether reflex sensitivity was systematically related to selected perinatal factors. The subjects were 24 male and 27 female newborns with a mean age of 28.9 hr. (SD = 16.8, range 5--72 hr.). The lateral tongue reflex was elicited by applying tactile stimulation of varying intensity to the lateral edge of the tongue approximately 1 cm off midline. Eight different stimuli from the Semmes-Weinstein esthesiometer were used; forces ranged from 68 mg to 3.6 gm. A total of 32 stimulations were given in two repetitions of 16 each (8 on the right side and 8 on the left side). The mean number of positive responses was 19.9 (SD = 3.2, range 13--25), with a 5% response at the lowest level of stimulation and a 100% response at the highest level. There were not differences in total number of positive responses or thresholds on the right and left sides, or in Repetitions I and II. There were no differences between males and females, vaginally and caesarian delivered infants, or resuscitated and non-resuscitated infants. No systematic differences were observed as a function of length of labor, obstetric medications, postnatal age at time of testing, Apgar scores, birth weight, or gestational age. The results suggest that the lateral tongue reflex is a stable and reproducible response that could be used to measure oral sensation, both in normal neonates and in subjects with various anatomical and/or neurosensory deficits.

摘要

我们对舌侧反射进行了一项研究,以确定反射敏感性是否与选定的围产期因素存在系统性关联。研究对象为24名男婴和27名女婴,平均年龄为28.9小时(标准差 = 16.8,范围5 - 72小时)。通过在距中线约1厘米处的舌侧边缘施加不同强度的触觉刺激来引发舌侧反射。使用了Semmes-Weinstein触觉测量仪的八种不同刺激;力量范围从68毫克到3.6克。总共进行了32次刺激,分两次重复,每次16次(右侧8次,左侧8次)。阳性反应的平均次数为19.9(标准差 = 3.2,范围13 - 25),在最低刺激水平时反应率为5%,在最高刺激水平时反应率为100%。右侧和左侧的阳性反应总数或阈值,以及第一次和第二次重复之间均无差异。男婴和女婴、经阴道分娩和剖宫产的婴儿、复苏和未复苏的婴儿之间均无差异。未观察到作为产程长度、产科用药、测试时的出生后年龄、阿氏评分、出生体重或孕周的函数的系统性差异。结果表明,舌侧反射是一种稳定且可重复的反应,可用于测量正常新生儿以及有各种解剖和/或神经感觉缺陷的受试者的口腔感觉。

相似文献

1
The lateral tongue reflex in human neonates.人类新生儿的舌侧反射。
Percept Mot Skills. 1978 Feb;46(1):331-7. doi: 10.2466/pms.1978.46.1.331.
2
The lateral tongue reflex in low birth weight infants.
Symp Oral Sens Percept. 1973(4):245-53.
3
Quantitative assessment of oral tactile sensitivity in pre-term and term neonates, and comparison with adults.早产儿和足月儿口腔触觉敏感性的定量评估及其与成年人的比较。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1976 Apr;18(2):204-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1976.tb03630.x.
4
Elicited tongue movements: touch and taste in the mouth of the neonate.诱发性舌运动:新生儿口腔内的触觉与味觉
Symp Oral Sens Percept. 1973(4):232-44.
5
[Effects of early multimodal stimulation on preterm newborn infants].
Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 1989 Dec;46(12):789-95.
6
Neonatal facial movements in the first minutes of life--eye opening and tongue thrust: an observational study.新生儿出生后最初几分钟的面部动作——睁眼和伸舌:一项观察性研究。
Am J Perinatol. 2007 Nov;24(10):611-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-992178. Epub 2007 Oct 30.
7
Establishing a reliable protocol to measure tongue sensation.建立一种可靠的测量舌感觉的方案。
J Oral Rehabil. 2007 Jun;34(6):433-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01735.x.
8
[Newborn asphyxia at term during delivery].分娩时足月新生儿窒息
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2003 Feb;32(1 Suppl):1S98-105.
9
Asphyxia of the newborn in east, central and southern Africa.东非、中非和南非的新生儿窒息情况
East Afr Med J. 1993 Jul;70(7):422-33.
10
Singleton vaginal breech delivery at term: still a safe option.足月单胎臀位阴道分娩:仍然是一种安全的选择。
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;103(3):407-12. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000113625.29073.4c.