• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

终末期肾病的流行病学及其对公共政策的影响。

Epidemiology of end stage renal disease and implications for public policy.

作者信息

Rubin R J

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 1984 Sep-Oct;99(5):492-8.

PMID:6435162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1424631/
Abstract

In 1972 the Congress extended Medicare coverage to all persons under age 65 suffering from end stage renal disease (ESRD). The intent of this law (PL 92-603, the Social Security Amendments of 1972) was to allow all Americans access to an emerging and very expensive technology, regardless of their ability to pay. The legislation had an immediate and dramatic impact on the population receiving dialysis. Prior to the passage of the legislation the dialysis population was white, educated, young, married, employed, and male. Within 4 years after implementation of the law, the dialysis population was more than one-third nonwhite, less well educated, significantly older, and about half female--making it more representative of the population as a whole. During consideration of this legislation the dialysis population was expected to increase from 5,000 to 7,000 patients and cost $135 million in the first year. Actually, in the first year of the program, there were 10,300 patients and the cost was $241 million. Today, while patients with ESRD represent only 0.25 percent of Medicare beneficiaries, they consume approximately 10 percent of the Medicare Part B budget. The humanitarian goals of the legislation have been met, but the costs of this program continue to rise as enrollment continues to grow. It is hoped that, through research and reimbursement policies, the per capita costs can be controlled and total costs can be reduced by shifts in treatment patterns and improvement in successful transplantation rates. There will, however, continue to be demands on our health care financing system to include reimbursement for new therapeutic modalities such as artificial hearts and heart and liver transplants.The lesson from the ESRD Program is that sound decisions require accurate epidemiologic data and cost projections.It is a challenge not easily met.

摘要

1972年,国会将医疗保险覆盖范围扩大至所有65岁以下的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者。这项法律(第92 - 603号公法,即1972年《社会保障修正案》)的目的是让所有美国人都能获得一项新兴且成本高昂的技术,无论其支付能力如何。该立法对接受透析的人群产生了立竿见影且巨大的影响。在该立法通过之前,透析人群主要是白人、受过教育、年轻、已婚、有工作且为男性。法律实施后的4年内,透析人群中有超过三分之一是非白人,受教育程度较低,年龄明显更大,约一半为女性——使其更能代表全体人口。在审议这项立法时,预计透析人群将从5000名患者增加到7000名,第一年成本为1.35亿美元。而实际上,该项目实施的第一年就有10300名患者,成本为2.41亿美元。如今,虽然ESRD患者仅占医疗保险受益人的0.25%,但他们消耗了医疗保险B部分预算的约10%。该立法的人道主义目标已经实现,但随着参保人数持续增加,这个项目的成本仍在不断上升。人们希望,通过研究和报销政策,人均成本能够得到控制,并且通过改变治疗模式和提高成功移植率来降低总成本。然而,我们的医疗保健融资系统仍将面临为人工心脏以及心脏和肝脏移植等新治疗方式提供报销的需求。ESRD项目的教训是,明智的决策需要准确的流行病学数据和成本预测。这是一项不易应对的挑战。

相似文献

1
Epidemiology of end stage renal disease and implications for public policy.终末期肾病的流行病学及其对公共政策的影响。
Public Health Rep. 1984 Sep-Oct;99(5):492-8.
2
The direction of end-stage renal disease reimbursement in the United States.美国终末期肾病报销的方向。
Semin Dial. 2004 Mar-Apr;17(2):125-30. doi: 10.1111/j.0894-0959.2004.17209.x.
3
Impact of reimbursement regulations on patient management.报销规定对患者管理的影响。
Am J Kidney Dis. 1992 Jul;20(1 Suppl 1):8-11.
4
The financial implications for Medicare of greater use of peritoneal dialysis.更多使用腹膜透析对医疗保险的财务影响。
Clin Ther. 2009 Apr;31(4):880-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.04.004.
5
Falling into the doughnut hole: drug spending among beneficiaries with end-stage renal disease under Medicare Part D plans.陷入“甜甜圈洞”:医疗保险D部分计划下终末期肾病受益人的药品支出
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Sep;17(9):2546-53. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005121385. Epub 2006 Jul 19.
6
[The cost of dialysis and kidney transplantation in France in 2007, impact of an increase of peritoneal dialysis and transplantation].[2007年法国透析和肾脏移植的费用,腹膜透析和移植增加的影响]
Nephrol Ther. 2010 Jul;6(4):240-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nephro.2010.04.005. Epub 2010 May 31.
7
A quarter century of medicare expenditures for ESRD.25年来医疗保险用于终末期肾病的支出。
Semin Nephrol. 2000 Nov;20(6):516-22.
8
ESRD in Australia and New Zealand at the end of the millennium: a report from the ANZDATA registry.千禧年末澳大利亚和新西兰的终末期肾病:来自澳新透析与移植登记处的报告
Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 Dec;40(6):1122-31. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.36943.
9
Medicare's ESRD Program, Part 1: Dialysis.医疗保险的终末期肾病项目,第1部分:透析
Physician Exec. 1989 Mar-Apr;15(2):24-6.
10
Should the medicare ESRD program pay for daily dialysis? An ethical analysis.医疗保险终末期肾病项目应该为每日透析付费吗?一项伦理分析。
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2007 Jul;14(3):290-6. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2007.03.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease: Epidemiological Analysis in a NorthEastern District of Italy Focusing on Access to Nephrological Care.5期慢性肾脏病:意大利东北部地区的流行病学分析,重点关注肾脏科护理的可及性
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 18;13(4):1144. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041144.

本文引用的文献

1
The Medicare experience with end-stage renal disease: trends in incidence, prevalence, and survival.医疗保险在终末期肾病方面的情况:发病率、患病率及生存率的趋势
Health Care Financ Rev. 1984 Spring;5(3):69-88.
2
Kidneys, ethics, and politics: policy lessons of the ESRD experience.肾脏、伦理与政治:终末期肾病经验的政策教训
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1981 Fall;6(3):488-503. doi: 10.1215/03616878-6-3-488.
3
Quality assurance vs cost containment: "damned if you do, damned if you don't".
AANNT J. 1982 Apr;9(2):13-23.
4
Increasing the supply of solid organs for transplantation.增加用于移植的实体器官供应。
Public Health Rep. 1983 Nov-Dec;98(6):566-72.