Meyer E, Yamamoto Y L
J Nucl Med. 1984 Apr;25(4):455-60.
This study evaluates the discrepancy between the true CBF value and the CBF value calculated according to the C15O2 steady-state model, for situations where the arterial input function, Ca(t), deviates considerably from its steady-state value, Ca. The fact that arterial input function and tissue O-15 concentration are not independent variables is taken into account. Inconstant or variable arterial input functions are simulated and the corresponding tissue O-15 concentrations calculated. The steady-state CBF values are evaluated for several temporal variations of Ca over the period of imaging, all derived from Ca(t) by simulation of various blood-sampling schemes, and are compared with the true CBF value. The study indicates that reliable CBF values are obtained by the C15O2 steady-state method even under severely impaired "unsteady-state" conditions, provided that either the true average arterial concentration over the entire scan, or the average concentration from multiple arterial samples, is used.
本研究评估了在动脉输入函数Ca(t)与其稳态值Ca有显著偏差的情况下,真实脑血流量(CBF)值与根据C15O2稳态模型计算的CBF值之间的差异。研究考虑了动脉输入函数和组织O-15浓度并非独立变量这一事实。模拟了不稳定或可变的动脉输入函数,并计算了相应的组织O-15浓度。针对成像期间Ca的几种时间变化评估稳态CBF值,所有这些变化均通过模拟各种采血方案从Ca(t)得出,并与真实CBF值进行比较。该研究表明,即使在严重受损的“非稳态”条件下,只要使用整个扫描过程中的真实平均动脉浓度或多个动脉样本的平均浓度,通过C15O2稳态方法就能获得可靠的CBF值。