Rule S J, Curtis D W
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1980 Sep;109(3):296-300.
Because nonmetric analyses of judged ratios and differences in sensory magnitude have yielded similar scales, some investigators have concluded that a single perceived relation underlies both judgment tasks. Issues rasied by this interpretation are considered in this article. Simulated data based on the assumption that subjects evaluate both perceived relations were computed for stimulus values used by Veit to investigate judgments of ratios and differences in grayness. A nonmetric analysis of both sets of simulated data in terms of a difference model yielded a solution such that each set of data was a weak monotonic transformation of the model's values, and the scale values were approximately linear with those obtained by Veit from empirical data. This result leaves open the question of whether one or two perceived relations underly the data. Ordinal properties of ratios and differences for a finite set are discussed together with their relation to systematic biases in psychophysical judgment tasks.
由于对感官量级的判断比率和差异进行的非度量分析产生了相似的量表,一些研究者得出结论,即两种判断任务背后存在单一的感知关系。本文将探讨这一解释所引发的问题。基于受试者对两种感知关系都进行评估这一假设,针对维特用于研究灰度比率和差异判断的刺激值计算了模拟数据。根据差异模型对两组模拟数据进行非度量分析,得到的一个解决方案是,每组数据都是该模型值的弱单调变换,且量表值与维特从经验数据中获得的值大致呈线性关系。这一结果并未解决数据背后是一种还是两种感知关系的问题。本文还讨论了有限集的比率和差异的顺序属性及其与心理物理学判断任务中系统偏差的关系。