Schwamm J
Int J Rehabil Res. 1980;3(1):5-13. doi: 10.1097/00004356-198003000-00001.
In the United States, the educational and human service systems, in addition to the attitudes and behaviors of the professionals associated with these systems, are being shaped to a lesser or greater extent by the Scandinavian ideology termed normalization. This paper examines such a belief system through a special education ideology scale developed by the author and administered to school committee members and superintendents in 16 communities in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The scale discriminates between varying ideological patterns of educational decision-makers as they pertain to the educational needs of handicapped children. Further, the scale is correlated with another tested belief system measuring political-economic conservatism. Analysis of the data revealed that special educational ideology varied significantly with political-economic orientations. According to community type--urban, small city, suburban, rural--the decision-makers varied significantly on their political-economic orientations. There were also noticeable differences in the extent to which special education policy was implemented. The greatest difficulty in placing children in the least restrictive environments was evident in the urban communities. While the findings are inconclusive, the data does suggest that a more progressive ideology, coupled with the strong relationship between education and politics, could contribute toward enhancing the effective implementation of special education and similar human service policies. The author recommends several possible options available to educational decision-makers at the community level which might improve upon the nature and extent of special education services and programs.
在美国,教育和公共服务系统,以及与这些系统相关的专业人员的态度和行为,在或多或少的程度上受到一种被称为“正常化”的斯堪的纳维亚意识形态的影响。本文通过作者开发的一个特殊教育意识形态量表来审视这样一种信仰体系,该量表施用于马萨诸塞州16个社区的学校委员会成员和学监。该量表区分了教育决策者在涉及残疾儿童教育需求方面的不同意识形态模式。此外,该量表还与另一个测试的测量政治经济保守主义的信仰体系相关。数据分析表明,特殊教育意识形态因政治经济取向的不同而有显著差异。根据社区类型——城市、小城市、郊区、农村——决策者在政治经济取向上有显著差异。在特殊教育政策的实施程度上也存在明显差异。在城市社区,将儿童安置在限制最少的环境中面临的最大困难最为明显。虽然研究结果尚无定论,但数据确实表明,一种更进步的意识形态,再加上教育与政治之间的紧密关系,可能有助于加强特殊教育及类似公共服务政策的有效实施。作者为社区层面的教育决策者推荐了几种可能的选择,这些选择可能会改善特殊教育服务和项目的性质和范围。