Wallace J M, Moser K M, Hartman M T, Ashburn W L
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981 Oct;124(4):480-3. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1981.124.4.480.
A vital factor conditioning the usage of the pulmonary perfusion (Q) scan in the evaluation of patients suspected of pulmonary embolism is the prevalence of abnormal Q scans in subjects free of cardiopulmonary disease. Because this prevalence has not been well defined, we performed Q scans in 80 nonsmoking subjects 18 to 29 yr of age having no known active cardiopulmonary disease. Each subject underwent a history, physical examination, electrocardiogram, spirometry, and PA chest roentgenogram, followed by a 6-view Q scan. Two subjects in whom a Q defect was suspected underwent a 133Xe equilibrium-washout ventilation (V) scan. All Q scans were interpreted blindly and independently by 2 experienced readers. Seventy-nine of the 80 Q scans were read as normal. No subject demonstrated a lobar or segmental defect. One of the 80 subjects, who had a mild pectus excavatum, had a left upper lobe subsegmental defect, which was not seen on the V scan. Based on the statistical analysis of these data, no more than 3.68% of normal nonsmoking persons in this age group may have a lobar or segmental Q scan defect and no more than 6.77% may have a subsegmental defect (with 95% confidence). Therefore, our study indicated that Q scan defects, particularly lobar or segmental, are rarely present among normal nonsmokers in this age group.
在评估疑似肺栓塞患者时,影响肺灌注(Q)扫描应用的一个关键因素是无心肺疾病受试者中Q扫描异常的发生率。由于这一发生率尚未明确界定,我们对80名年龄在18至29岁、无已知活动性心肺疾病的非吸烟受试者进行了Q扫描。每位受试者均接受了病史采集、体格检查、心电图、肺功能测定和胸部后前位X线片检查,随后进行了六视野Q扫描。两名疑似存在Q缺损的受试者接受了133Xe平衡洗脱通气(V)扫描。所有Q扫描均由两名经验丰富的阅片者独立进行盲法解读。80例Q扫描中有79例被解读为正常。没有受试者表现出叶或节段性缺损。80名受试者中有1名患有轻度漏斗胸,其左上叶亚节段性缺损在V扫描中未见。基于这些数据的统计分析,该年龄组正常非吸烟人群中,叶或节段性Q扫描缺损的发生率不超过3.68%,亚节段性缺损的发生率不超过6.77%(95%置信区间)。因此,我们的研究表明,在该年龄组的正常非吸烟者中,Q扫描缺损,尤其是叶或节段性缺损很少见。