估算社区中的残疾患病率：样本设计与应答偏差的影响。
Estimating the prevalence of disability in the community: the influence of sample design and response bias.
作者信息
Locker D, Wiggins R, Sittampalam Y, Patrick D L
出版信息
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1981 Sep;35(3):208-12. doi: 10.1136/jech.35.3.208.
Abstract
An estimate of the prevalence of physical disability in the community based upon a sample survey may be influenced by the sample design and the response to the method of data collection employed. In this paper we describe a postal survey of a sample of households in the London borough of Lambeth and the procedures used for calculating the influence of these factors on the estimate produced. These procedures can be used to adjust the estimate to take account of the relative chance of households falling into the sample and to correct for non-response bias.
摘要
基于抽样调查对社区身体残疾患病率的估计可能会受到样本设计以及对所采用数据收集方法的回应的影响。在本文中，我们描述了对伦敦兰贝斯区一个家庭样本的邮寄调查，以及用于计算这些因素对所得估计值影响的程序。这些程序可用于调整估计值，以考虑家庭被纳入样本的相对概率，并校正无应答偏差。
相似文献
1
Estimating the prevalence of disability in the community: the influence of sample design and response bias.估算社区中的残疾患病率：样本设计与应答偏差的影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1981 Sep;35(3):208-12. doi: 10.1136/jech.35.3.208.
2
A confidence interval approach to investigating non-response bias and monitoring response to postal questionnaires.一种用于调查无应答偏差和监测邮寄问卷回复情况的置信区间方法。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991 Mar;45(1):81-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.45.1.81.
3
Screening for disability in the inner city.内城区残疾筛查
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1981 Mar;35(1):65-70. doi: 10.1136/jech.35.1.65.
4
Investigating non-response bias in a survey of disablement in the community: implications for survey methodology.调查社区残疾情况调查中的无应答偏差：对调查方法的启示
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991 Sep;45(3):247-50. doi: 10.1136/jech.45.3.247.
5
Data quality assurance: an analysis of patient non-response.数据质量保证：患者无应答分析
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011;24(3):198-210. doi: 10.1108/09526861111116642.
6
Disability in the community of north Lambeth.北兰贝斯社区的残疾情况。
Br J Prev Soc Med. 1970 Feb;24(1):64. doi: 10.1136/jech.24.1.64-a.
7
Chronic disease and disability in the community: a prevalence study.社区中的慢性病与残疾：一项患病率研究。
Br Med J. 1970 Sep 26;3(5725):762-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5725.762.
8
Investigating the proxy effect and the saliency principle in household based postal questionnaires.研究基于家庭的邮政问卷中的代理效应和显著性原则。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991 Dec;45(4):312-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.45.4.312.
9
A two-phase sampling survey for nonresponse and its paradata to correct nonresponse bias in a health surveillance survey.一项针对无应答及其辅助数据的两阶段抽样调查，以纠正健康监测调查中的无应答偏差。
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2017 Feb;65(1):71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2016.10.059. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
10
Disabled children in the UK: a quality assessment of quantitative data sources.英国的残疾儿童：定量数据来源的质量评估
Child Care Health Dev. 2010 Jan;36(1):130-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01017.x. Epub 2009 Sep 4.
引用本文的文献
1
Listening to Mental Health Crisis Needs at Scale: Using Natural Language Processing to Understand and Evaluate a Mental Health Crisis Text Messaging Service.大规模倾听心理健康危机需求：利用自然语言处理理解和评估心理健康危机短信服务
Front Digit Health. 2021 Dec 6;3:779091. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.779091. eCollection 2021.
2
Understanding the Challenges and Uncertainties of Seroprevalence Studies for SARS-CoV-2.理解 SARS-CoV-2 血清流行率研究中的挑战和不确定性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 27;18(9):4640. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094640.
3
The impact of non-response bias due to sampling in public health studies: A comparison of voluntary versus mandatory recruitment in a Dutch national survey on adolescent health.公共卫生研究中抽样导致的无应答偏倚的影响：荷兰青少年健康全国性调查中自愿招募与强制招募的比较。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 23;17(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4189-8.
4
Quality of life after curative liver resection: a single center analysis.根治性肝切除术后的生活质量：单中心分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 May 21;16(19):2388-95. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i19.2388.
5
Total and cause specific mortality among participants and non-participants of population based health surveys: a comprehensive follow up of 54 372 Finnish men and women.基于人群的健康调查参与者和非参与者的全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率：对54372名芬兰男性和女性的全面随访
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Apr;59(4):310-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.024349.
6
Does non-responder bias have a significant effect on the results in a postal questionnaire study?在邮寄问卷调查研究中，无应答偏倚对结果有显著影响吗？
Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17(9):809-17. doi: 10.1023/a:1015615130459.
7
Non-responders to a postal questionnaire on respiratory symptoms and diseases.对一份关于呼吸道症状和疾病的邮政调查问卷无回应者。
Eur J Epidemiol. 1999 Mar;15(3):293-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1007582518922.
8
Comparing survey data on functional disability: the impact of some methodological differences.比较关于功能残疾的调查数据：一些方法学差异的影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Feb;50(1):86-93. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.1.86.
9
Disablement and care: a comparison of patient views and general practitioner knowledge.残疾与护理：患者观点与全科医生认知的比较
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1982 Jul;32(240):429-34.
10
Investigating non-response bias in a survey of disablement in the community: implications for survey methodology.调查社区残疾情况调查中的无应答偏差：对调查方法的启示
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991 Sep;45(3):247-50. doi: 10.1136/jech.45.3.247.
本文引用的文献
1
Chronic disease and disability in the community: a prevalence study.社区中的慢性病与残疾：一项患病率研究。
Br Med J. 1970 Sep 26;3(5725):762-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5725.762.
2
Bias resulting from missing information: some epidemiological findings.信息缺失导致的偏倚：一些流行病学研究结果。
Br J Prev Soc Med. 1977 Jun;31(2):131-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.31.2.131.
Zotero 插件