Fantl J A, Papp K K, Dunn L J
Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Sep;64(3):440-2.
A system for the evaluation of clinical clerks in obstetrics and gynecology is presented. Final grades were assigned through faculty judgment rather than by the use of a numerical formula. Judgment was based on narratives and grades on clinical performance as well as results of oral and written examinations. All elements of the evaluation correlated with the final grade. The clinical grade correlated best. The final grades assigned by judgment were compared with those that would have resulted from applying a numerical formula. They differed in the distribution of higher grades, but were identical for the lower grades. Both correlated equally with the Obstetrics and Gynecology subtest of the National Boards, Part II examination.
本文介绍了一种用于评估妇产科临床实习医生的系统。最终成绩是通过教师评判给出的，而非使用数字公式。评判基于临床实习表现的描述及成绩，以及口试和笔试的结果。评估的所有要素都与最终成绩相关。临床成绩的相关性最佳。将通过评判给出的最终成绩与应用数字公式得出的成绩进行比较。二者在高分段分布有所不同，但在低分段相同。二者与国家医师资格考试第二部分妇产科分测验的相关性相同。
