Schräder R, Wolpers H G, Hoeft A, Korb H, Hellige G
Radiologe. 1984 May;24(5):240-6.
The acute cardiovascular side effects of iopamidol (osmolality: 0.8 osmol/kg), metrizamide (0.6 osmol/kg), and amidotrizoate (2.1 osmol/kg) during coronary arteriography (n = 30) and left ventriculography (n = 9) have been compared in anesthetized closed-chest dogs (n = 5). The influences of these contrast media on hemodynamics, coronary circulation, ECG and physicochemical properties of coronary sinus blood were evaluated. Following intracoronary injection, iopamidol and metrizamide cause positive inotropism while amidotrizoate initially induces cardiodepression. All contrast solutions lead to marked increase of myocardial blood flow. Electrocardiographic changes are greater after amidotrizoate (P less than 0.05). A fall of cationic content in coronary sinus blood is seen after each contrast medium. Amidotrizoate leads to more decrease of potassium (P less than 0.01) and both ionized and total calcium (P less than 0.001). Increase of osmolality and hydrogen ionic content is greater after amidotrizoate than after iopamidol and metrizamide (P less than 0.01). Following left ventricular injection, marked peripheral vasodilation, as seen after amidotrizoate, does not occur after low osmolality compounds. There are no significant differences between iopamidol and metrizamide in spite of the slightly higher osmolality of the former. Thus, both contrast materials should be equivalent with respect to their acute cardiovascular side effects under clinical conditions. Advantages of low osmolality radiological contrast media are discussed.
在5只麻醉的开胸犬身上,比较了碘帕醇(渗透压:0.8 osmol/kg)、甲泛葡胺(0.6 osmol/kg)和泛影酸盐(2.1 osmol/kg)在冠状动脉造影(n = 30)和左心室造影(n = 9)期间的急性心血管副作用。评估了这些造影剂对血流动力学、冠状动脉循环、心电图以及冠状窦血液理化性质的影响。冠状动脉内注射后,碘帕醇和甲泛葡胺引起正性肌力作用,而泛影酸盐最初诱发心肌抑制。所有造影剂溶液均导致心肌血流量显著增加。泛影酸盐注射后心电图变化更大(P < 0.05)。每种造影剂注射后冠状窦血液中的阳离子含量均下降。泛影酸盐导致钾(P < 0.01)以及离子钙和总钙(P < 0.001)的下降幅度更大。泛影酸盐注射后渗透压和氢离子含量升高幅度大于碘帕醇和甲泛葡胺(P < 0.01)。左心室注射后,低渗性化合物注射后未出现泛影酸盐注射后所见的明显外周血管扩张。尽管碘帕醇的渗透压略高,但碘帕醇和甲泛葡胺之间无显著差异。因此,在临床条件下,两种造影剂的急性心血管副作用应相当。讨论了低渗性放射造影剂的优点。