Waddell P A, Gronwall D M
Acta Neurol Scand. 1984 May;69(5):270-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1984.tb07812.x.
9 consecutively referred closed head injury (CHI) patients were assessed for sensitivity to light and sound stimuli, within 7-19 days of injury, on both objective and subjective measures. Patients were matched with controls on age, sex, race, socio-economic status and order of test administration. The mean luminance (1366 lux) tolerated by CHI patients was significantly lower (0.01 level by Student's t-test for related samples) than that tolerated by controls (1783 lux). The mean sound intensity tolerated by CHI patients was also lower (82 db) than for controls (94 db), though this difference was not statistically significant. Subjective ratings of sensitivity made by CHI patients after exposure to intense sound and light stimuli, showed no relationship to objective ratings of tolerance. The results demonstrate an objective basis for complaints of increased sensitivity, at least to light, following CHI. These findings do not support earlier "psychogenic" explanations of post-concussion syndrome (PCS) etiology.
对9例连续转诊的闭合性颅脑损伤(CHI)患者在受伤后7至19天内,就客观和主观指标评估了其对光和声刺激的敏感性。患者在年龄、性别、种族、社会经济地位和测试实施顺序方面与对照组进行了匹配。CHI患者耐受的平均亮度(1366勒克斯)显著低于对照组(1783勒克斯)(相关样本的学生t检验,P<0.01)。CHI患者耐受的平均声强(82分贝)也低于对照组(94分贝),尽管这种差异无统计学意义。CHI患者在暴露于强光和声刺激后所做的敏感性主观评分与耐受性客观评分无关。结果表明,至少对于光,CHI后敏感性增加的主诉有客观依据。这些发现不支持早期对脑震荡后综合征(PCS)病因的“心因性”解释。