Suppr超能文献

阑尾切除术和胆囊切除术后的腹腔引流

Abdominal drainage following appendectomy and cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Stone H H, Hooper C A, Millikan W J

出版信息

Ann Surg. 1978 Jun;187(6):606-12. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197806000-00004.

Abstract

Consecutive patients undergoing emergency appendectomy (283) or urgent cholecystectomy (51) were prospectively studied for the development of post-operative incisional or peritoneal sepsis. Severity of the original peritoneal infection was carefully recorded, while use of a Penrose dam to drain the peritoneum was randomized according to pre-assigned hospital number. Both aerobic and anaerobic cultures were taken from the abdomen at the time of operation as well as from all postoperative infectious foci. Results demonstrated no essential differences in incidence of wound and peritoneal infection following appendectomy for simple or suppurative appendicitis (187) or following cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (51). However, with gangrenous or perforative appendicitis (94), incisional and intra-abdominal infection rates were 43% and 45%, respectively, when a drain was used; yet only 29 and 13%, respectively, without a drain. These latter differences were significant (p < 0.001). In addition, intra-abdominal abscesses were three times as likely to drain through the incision than along any tract provided by the rubber conduit. Cultures revealed that hospital pathogens accounted for a greater proportion of wound and peritoneal sepsis after cholecystectomy and appendectomy for simple or suppurative appendicitis if a drain had been inserted than if managed otherwise. By contrast, a mixed bacterial flora was responsible for most infections following appendectomy for gangrenous or perforated appendicitis, irrespective as to use of a drain.

摘要

对连续接受急诊阑尾切除术(283例)或急诊胆囊切除术(51例)的患者进行前瞻性研究,以观察术后切口或腹膜感染的发生情况。仔细记录原腹膜感染的严重程度,根据预先分配的医院编号随机决定是否使用橡皮引流管引流腹膜。在手术时以及所有术后感染灶处采集需氧和厌氧培养样本。结果显示,单纯性或化脓性阑尾炎行阑尾切除术后(187例)或急性胆囊炎行胆囊切除术后(51例),伤口和腹膜感染的发生率无本质差异。然而,对于坏疽性或穿孔性阑尾炎(94例),使用引流管时切口感染率和腹腔内感染率分别为43%和45%;而不使用引流管时分别为29%和13%。后两者差异具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。此外,腹腔内脓肿经切口引流的可能性是经橡皮导管引流途径的三倍。培养结果显示,对于单纯性或化脓性阑尾炎行胆囊切除术和阑尾切除术后,如果插入了引流管,医院病原菌在伤口和腹膜脓毒症中所占比例高于未使用引流管的情况。相比之下,坏疽性或穿孔性阑尾炎行阑尾切除术后,无论是否使用引流管,大多数感染由混合菌群引起。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Efficiency of peritoneal drainage.腹膜引流的效率
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1970 Nov;131(5):983-5.
6
Prophylactic abdominal drains.预防性腹腔引流管。
Arch Surg. 1972 Aug;105(2):173-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1972.04180080027005.
7
Intraperitoneal drainage.腹腔引流
Surg Clin North Am. 1969 Dec;49(6):1279-88.
10
Incisional and peritoneal infection after emergency celiotomy.急诊剖腹术后切口及腹腔感染
Ann Surg. 1973 Jun;177(6):669-78. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197306000-00005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验