• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Evaluation of industrial hearing conservation programs: a review and analysis.

作者信息

Melnick W

出版信息

Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1984 Jul;45(7):459-67. doi: 10.1080/15298668491400106.

DOI:10.1080/15298668491400106
PMID:6464993
Abstract

In 1981, a large scale reviews of the literature concerning the effects of noise on hearing was initiated by the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Diseases and Stroke. This review concentrated on the information published in the decade of the 1970's and underscored the importance of evaluating the effectiveness of industrial hearing conservation programs. Published information on this topic was scanty prior to 1970. Investigations of the application and utility of methods for this evaluation have only recently begun to appear in the literature. The status of evaluating hearing conservation programs is the subject of the present review. Three evaluation methods are considered in detail: use of various proposed criteria for significant threshold shift; methods used by Pell at DuPont; and more recent methods developed by Royster. The condition and availability of data do not permit selection of the optimum evaluation procedure. Systematic collection and analysis of data from industrial programs are necessary if acceptable standardized procedures for evaluation of hearing conservation programs are to be developed.

摘要

相似文献

1
Evaluation of industrial hearing conservation programs: a review and analysis.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1984 Jul;45(7):459-67. doi: 10.1080/15298668491400106.
2
The contribution of focus groups in the evaluation of hearing conservation program (HCP) effectiveness.焦点小组在听力保护计划(HCP)效果评估中的作用。
J Safety Res. 2004;35(1):91-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2003.12.001.
3
Group mean hearing threshold changes in a noise-exposed industrial population using personal hearing protectors.使用个人听力保护器的噪声暴露工业人群的组平均听力阈值变化
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1987 Jan;48(1):23-7. doi: 10.1080/15298668791384300.
4
Self-reported hearing loss among workers potentially exposed to industrial noise--United States.美国可能接触工业噪声的工人自我报告的听力损失情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1988 Mar 18;37(10):158, 164-7.
5
Hearing conservation in industry.工业中的听力保护
West J Med. 1982 Dec;137(6):499-505.
6
Standard threshold shift criteria. An investigation of the most reliable indicator of noise-induced hearing loss.标准阈移标准。噪声性听力损失最可靠指标的研究。
J Occup Med. 1985 Jan;27(1):34-42.
7
Noise-induced hearing loss.噪声性听力损失
Am J Otol. 1986 Mar;7(2):141-9.
8
Occupational hearing conservation.职业听力保护。
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1991 Apr;24(2):403-14.
9
Noise-induced hearing loss.噪声性听力损失
Air Med J. 2005 Mar-Apr;24(2):73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2004.12.005.
10
Safety in numbers misleading in assessing auditory risk criteria.数量安全在评估听觉风险标准时具有误导性。
Occup Health Saf. 1984 Jan:58-60, 66.

引用本文的文献

1
Prolonged noise exposure-induced auditory threshold shifts in wistar rats: Proposal of an experimental exposure protocol based on noise dose.长时间噪声暴露诱导的Wistar大鼠听觉阈值变化:基于噪声剂量的实验性暴露方案建议
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Apr 2;91(4):101570. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2025.101570.
2
Strategy for prevention and control of the risks due to noise.噪声风险防控策略
Occup Environ Med. 2000 Jun;57(6):361-9. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.6.361.
3
A tentative proposal for classification of audiograms in noise-induced deafness: relationship between audiogram and subjective complaints in noise-exposed workers.
噪声性聋中听力图分类的初步建议:噪声暴露工人的听力图与主观症状之间的关系
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1986;57(3):173-83. doi: 10.1007/BF00405786.