Suppr超能文献

非专业人员心肺复苏——我们培训的对象正确吗?

Layperson CPR--are we training the right people?

作者信息

Goldberg R J, Gore J M, Love D G, Ockene J K, Dalen J E

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1984 Sep;13(9 Pt 1):701-4. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(84)80731-3.

Abstract

A case-control study was undertaken to examine differences in the extent of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training among family members of patients with and without coronary heart disease. There were no significant differences in the proportion of family members of patients with coronary disease (22.0%) who had ever taken a CPR course compared to family members of patients seen in a primary care clinic (25.6%) or in randomly selected neighborhood controls (28.7%). Family members of patients with coronary disease, however, had not only taken fewer CPR courses but had taken these courses considerably further in the past than had respective comparison groups. Moreover only 9% of these family members had taken CPR due to their family member's coronary disease.

摘要

开展了一项病例对照研究,以检查冠心病患者和非冠心病患者家庭成员心肺复苏(CPR)培训程度的差异。冠心病患者家庭成员中曾参加过CPR课程的比例为22.0%,与初级保健诊所患者的家庭成员(25.6%)或随机选择的社区对照者(28.7%)相比,没有显著差异。然而,冠心病患者的家庭成员不仅参加的CPR课程较少,而且与各自的对照组相比,他们参加这些课程的时间要早得多。此外,这些家庭成员中只有9%是因为其家庭成员患有冠心病而参加CPR培训的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验