Röhrer-Ertl O, Helmer R
Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrb. 1984;130(3):369-98.
The authors discuss briefly the status of the method of plastic face-reconstruction after Kollmann. Results of fundamental research are treated as well as the standardization of technical processes. The difference to the His-method is discussed and it is stated that the newly modified method after Kollmann now seems to be suitable to allow a restricted application in the skull-identification. Moreover it may now be used to clear up anthropological questions, while in the past it did not always prove to be successful. In no case however artistically satisfactory results can be expected, not are they intended. For this purpose the His-method should be used as usual.
作者简要讨论了科尔曼之后的面部整形重建方法的现状。论述了基础研究的成果以及技术流程的标准化。讨论了与希斯方法的差异，并指出科尔曼新改进的方法现在似乎适用于颅骨鉴定的有限应用。此外，它现在可用于解决人类学问题，而过去它并非总能成功。然而，无论如何都不能期望得到艺术上令人满意的结果，也不是以此为目的。为此，应照常使用希斯方法。
