Regazzi M B, Rondanelli R, Vidale E, Chirico G, Rondini G, Chiara A, Piccolo A
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1984;4(2):109-12.
Despite a considerable amount of investigation, controversy continues concerning the use of indomethacin in inducing the closure of patent ductus arteriosus. This controversy may be attributable to differences in dosage, route of administration, postnatal age at treatment and the variable pharmacokinetics of the drug in premature infants. The pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of i.v. administered indomethacin in five premature infants with PDA were evaluated. There was considerable intersubject variability in the half life of elimination (63.1 +/- 38 h). This variability was mainly due to clearance (0.0086 +/- 0.0069 l/h/kg) rather than to distribution volume variability (0.54 +/- 0.27 l/kg). A reduction of half life was observed after the second dose, probably due to a maturation process. A permanent closure of the ductus was obtained in two patients after the first dose and in two patients after the second dose. The side-effects observed in our infants were transient and no long-term complication was attributable to this drug.
尽管进行了大量研究,但关于使用吲哚美辛诱导动脉导管未闭闭合仍存在争议。这种争议可能归因于剂量、给药途径、治疗时的出生后年龄以及该药物在早产儿体内可变的药代动力学。对5例患有动脉导管未闭的早产儿静脉注射吲哚美辛的药代动力学和临床疗效进行了评估。消除半衰期存在相当大的个体间差异(63.1±38小时)。这种差异主要是由于清除率(0.0086±0.0069升/小时/千克),而非分布容积差异(0.54±0.27升/千克)。第二次给药后观察到半衰期缩短,可能是由于成熟过程。2例患者在首次给药后动脉导管永久性闭合,2例患者在第二次给药后闭合。在我们的婴儿中观察到的副作用是短暂的,且没有长期并发症可归因于该药物。