• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为医学决策基础的决策分析:希波克拉底之树

Decision analysis as a basis for medical decision making: the tree of hippocrates.

作者信息

Zarin D A, Pauker S G

出版信息

J Med Philos. 1984 May;9(2):181-213. doi: 10.1093/jmp/9.2.181.

DOI:10.1093/jmp/9.2.181
PMID:6470585
Abstract

Physicians have developed a number of implicit and explicit approaches to complex medical decisions. Decision analysis is an explicit, quantitative method of clinical decision making that involves the separation of the probabilities of events from their relative values, or utilities. Its use can help physicians make difficult choices in a manner that promotes true patient participation. Decision analysis also provides a framework for the incorporation of data from multiple sources and for the assessment of the impact of uncertain data on the final decision. Although this approach is imperfect, it represents a significant advance in clinical decision making.

摘要

医生们已经开发出了许多处理复杂医疗决策的隐性和显性方法。决策分析是一种明确的、定量的临床决策方法,它涉及将事件的概率与其相对价值或效用区分开来。其应用有助于医生以促进患者真正参与的方式做出艰难选择。决策分析还为整合来自多个来源的数据以及评估不确定数据对最终决策的影响提供了一个框架。尽管这种方法并不完美,但它代表了临床决策方面的一项重大进步。

相似文献

1
Decision analysis as a basis for medical decision making: the tree of hippocrates.作为医学决策基础的决策分析:希波克拉底之树
J Med Philos. 1984 May;9(2):181-213. doi: 10.1093/jmp/9.2.181.
2
Informed consent: court viewpoints and medical decision making.知情同意:法院观点与医疗决策
Med Decis Making. 1986 Oct-Dec;6(4):224-30. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8600600407.
3
Clinical decision consultation service.临床决策咨询服务
Am J Med. 1986 Jun;80(6):1169-76. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90680-7.
4
When the treatment goal is not cure: are cancer patients equipped to make informed decisions?当治疗目标并非治愈时:癌症患者是否具备做出明智决策的能力?
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jan 15;20(2):503-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.2.503.
5
Quantitative theories for clinical decision making.临床决策的定量理论。
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1984;32(3-4):172-80.
6
Family and physician influence on asthma research participation decisions for adolescents: the effects of adolescent gender and research risk.家庭和医生对青少年哮喘研究参与决策的影响:青少年性别与研究风险的作用
Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):e356-62. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2589.
7
Risk and medical ethics.风险与医学伦理。
J Med Ethics. 1982 Dec;8(4):180-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.8.4.180.
8
Right action: commentary on "Practical reasoning in medicine.正确行动:对“医学中的实践推理”的评论
J Clin Ethics. 1990 Fall;1(3):193-4.
9
The roulette wheel: an aid to informed decision making.轮盘赌:辅助明智决策的工具。
PLoS Med. 2006 Jun;3(6):e137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030137.
10
Science, ethics, and the making of clinical decisions. Implications for risk factor intervention.科学、伦理与临床决策的制定。对风险因素干预的启示。
JAMA. 1988 Jun 3;259(21):3161-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The tacit dimension of clinical judgment.临床判断的隐性维度。
Yale J Biol Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;63(1):47-61.