Rosenzweig R M
J Neurosurg. 1984 Oct;61(4):625-32. doi: 10.3171/jns.1984.61.4.0625.
A political scientist examines the worlds of advanced medicine and the modern research university. Both elements are affected by the growth in the role of government. Central government had sharply limited powers early in this century, but by the middle third their powers were enlarged, particularly in the spheres of the economy and social welfare. The last third of the century will reveal what the governed want of the government. The scientific and technological aspects of World War II plunged the universities into the limelight as the main producers of vital knowledge and as objects of national policy. This power of knowledge expanded from national security to public health and welfare. Governmental patronage fostered basic medical research and revolution in biology. With advanced research there marched advanced training. America's leading research universities became stronger and flourished for a few decades, to be confronted suddenly by a shift in government priorities. Governmental fiscal support has dwindled while governmental regulation has increased. The medical profession passed from an early position of opposing the role of government to a position in which it paid inadequate attention to the adverse consequences of the systems that were adopted. Physicians who practice in a variety of settings have a variety of interests which account for the division within the profession. In a political setting it is advantageous and more important to have a clear view of central common interests. The speaker's advice to his colleagues in education is applicable to medicine, to act now in a manner to serve as a model for a vision of a "plausible future." The measure of success in the future depends upon the ability to preserve those values, practices, and habits of mind that account for our value to society. The primacy of scholarly judgments over political judgments is not always easy to achieve in dealings with governments.
一位政治科学家审视了先进医学领域和现代研究型大学。这两个要素都受到政府作用增强的影响。本世纪初,中央政府权力极为有限,但到本世纪中叶的三分之一时期,其权力得到扩大,尤其是在经济和社会福利领域。本世纪最后三分之一时期将揭示民众对政府的期望。第二次世界大战的科技层面使大学成为关键知识的主要生产者以及国家政策的对象,从而备受瞩目。这种知识的力量从国家安全扩展到公共卫生与福利。政府的资助推动了基础医学研究以及生物学领域的变革。先进的研究带动了先进的培训。美国顶尖的研究型大学在几十年间变得更加强大且繁荣发展,却突然遭遇政府优先事项的转变。政府财政支持减少,而政府监管却在增加。医学界从最初反对政府作用的立场,转变为对所采用体系的不良后果关注不足的立场。在各种环境中执业的医生有着各种各样的利益,这导致了该行业内部的分歧。在政治环境中,清晰认识核心共同利益既有利又更为重要。演讲者给教育界同行的建议同样适用于医学领域,即现在就以一种方式行事,为“合理未来”的愿景树立典范。未来成功的衡量标准取决于能否保留那些使我们对社会有价值的价值观、做法和思维习惯。在与政府打交道时,学术判断优先于政治判断并非总是容易做到的。