Jago J D
Soc Sci Med. 1984;19(2):117-22. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(84)90277-6.
This paper uses evidence from reports in the British Dental Journal from 1958 to 1979 of disciplinary charges against dentists in the United Kingdom to question the General Dental Council's (GDC) claim that it is protecting the public in relation to the competence of dental practitioners. In that 20-year period only one charge out of 86 heard by the GDC Disciplinary Committee had to do with a possible lack of professional competence, whereas 47% of the charges were for fraud and other criminal offences, 18% were for drug-related offences, 18% were for sex offences and 16% were for breaches of professional ethics or discipline. The paper argues that the GDC has been much more concerned with developing a professional image and style for dentists than it has been with assuring an adequate level of dental care for patients by dentists once they graduate. Although the data used to support the argument are fom Britain and from dentistry, the argument may be extended to all professional occupations and countries where there is a State-enforced medical monopoly in relation to clients.
本文利用1958年至1979年《英国牙科杂志》上关于英国牙医纪律指控报告中的证据,对英国牙科总会(GDC)声称其在牙医执业能力方面保护公众的说法提出质疑。在那20年期间,GDC纪律委员会审理的86起指控中,只有1起与可能缺乏专业能力有关,而47%的指控是欺诈和其他刑事犯罪,18%是与毒品相关的犯罪,18%是性犯罪,16%是违反职业道德或纪律。该论文认为,GDC更关注为牙医塑造专业形象和风格,而不是确保牙医毕业后为患者提供足够水平的牙科护理。尽管用于支持该论点的数据来自英国和牙科领域,但该论点可能适用于所有存在国家强制医疗垄断以服务客户的专业职业和国家。