Kriedemann E, Rotte K H, Marciniak H, Wehry B
Z Urol Nephrol. 1984 May;77(5):257-67.
The urographic results obtained in 14 patients with tumors of the renal pelvis are compared with those of computer tomography (CT), and the diagnostic possibilities emerging from CT are described. CT is superior to urography and angiography not only in the discovery of renal pelvic tumors but also in their further differentiation. In addition, CT gives information in case if bilateral processes and lymph node metastases. Nonetheless, intravenous pyelography continues to hold the first place in the diagnosis of pathological processes of the renal pelvis. This holds both for tumor detection and suspicion and for indirect signs, namely the "mute" kidney or hydronephrosis. Angiography is less information with renal pelvic tumors, and with ultrasonic diagnostics there is no sufficient experience up to now.
对14例肾盂肿瘤患者的尿路造影结果与计算机断层扫描(CT)结果进行了比较,并描述了CT所显示的诊断可能性。CT不仅在发现肾盂肿瘤方面优于尿路造影和血管造影,而且在对其进一步鉴别诊断上也更具优势。此外,CT还能提供有关双侧病变和淋巴结转移的信息。尽管如此,静脉肾盂造影在肾盂病理过程的诊断中仍占据首位。这在肿瘤检测与怀疑以及间接征象(即“无功能”肾或肾积水)方面均适用。血管造影对于肾盂肿瘤提供的信息较少,而截至目前超声诊断尚无足够的经验。