Schild D
Biol Cybern. 1984;50(5):357-61. doi: 10.1007/BF00336960.
Five possibilities of defining a coefficient of facilitation and inhibition are described. It is shown that the application of these definitions to the same spike train activity eventually leads to considerably different results, e.g., a response which is inhibitory according to one definition sometimes is facilitatory according to another definition. To find the most reliable definition the theoretical differences between the five alternatives are examined, whereby a coefficient is considered reliable if it is reproducible and independent of external experimental parameters, such as the record length. As an experimental example spike trains were recorded from mitral cells in the olfactory bulb of the goldfish. We divide every response into two sections: an initial reaction and a steady state reaction. In this way each response can be uniquely classified. The most reliable definition of a coefficient of facilitation turns out to be based on the steady state levels of an averaged peristimulus time histogramme. Under certain conditions this corresponds to considering the means of the sample mean rates of a stochastic point process before and after the stimulus application, whereby the initial reactions are neglected. These should be classified by other methods and notions.
文中描述了定义易化系数和抑制系数的五种可能性。结果表明,将这些定义应用于相同的脉冲序列活动最终会导致截然不同的结果,例如,根据一种定义为抑制性的反应,根据另一种定义有时却是易化性的。为了找到最可靠的定义,我们研究了这五种备选方案之间的理论差异,其中,如果一个系数是可重复的且独立于外部实验参数(如记录长度),则认为该系数是可靠的。作为一个实验示例,记录了金鱼嗅球中二尖瓣细胞的脉冲序列。我们将每个反应分为两个部分:初始反应和稳态反应。通过这种方式,每个反应都可以被唯一分类。结果表明,易化系数最可靠的定义是基于平均刺激时间直方图的稳态水平。在某些条件下,这相当于考虑刺激施加前后随机点过程的样本平均速率的均值,其中忽略了初始反应。这些初始反应应该用其他方法和概念进行分类。