Johnson C B, Meyers A W, Schleser R, Thackwray D
J Community Health. 1984 Spring;9(3):206-15. doi: 10.1007/BF01326701.
This study was part of a continuing effort to develop a community-based approach to health care. Student volunteers in seventh- and ninth-grade health classes were trained to take blood pressure measurements and then conduct door-to-door screening for hypertension. One group of student volunteers within each grade level screened households surrounding the school they attended (low-convenience condition), while another group of volunteers screened households adjacent to their own homes (high-convenience condition). The results from these screening methods were compared with the results obtained from a central-site neighborhood screening center. Chi-square tests on the proportion of households screened indicated that the high convenience door-to-door screening method was significantly more effective than either the low-convenience door-to-door method or the central-site screening method. The latter two methods were not statistically different from each other. Both seventh and ninth graders screened significantly more households in the high-convenience condition than in the low-convenience condition. Ninth graders were superior to seventh graders in the high-convenience, but not in the low-convenience, condition.
本研究是持续努力开发基于社区的医疗保健方法的一部分。七年级和九年级健康课程的学生志愿者接受了测量血压的培训，然后挨家挨户进行高血压筛查。每个年级水平的一组学生志愿者对他们就读学校周围的家庭进行筛查（低便利性条件），而另一组志愿者对他们自己家附近的家庭进行筛查（高便利性条件）。将这些筛查方法的结果与从中心站点社区筛查中心获得的结果进行比较。对筛查家庭比例的卡方检验表明，高便利性挨家挨户筛查方法比低便利性挨家挨户方法或中心站点筛查方法显著更有效。后两种方法在统计学上没有差异。七年级和九年级学生在高便利性条件下筛查的家庭显著多于低便利性条件下。九年级学生在高便利性条件下优于七年级学生，但在低便利性条件下并非如此。
