Darby T D
Clin Toxicol. 1978 Feb;12(2):229-38. doi: 10.3109/15563657809150201.
Final assessment of product acceptance must be based on value judgments that include (a) social, (b) economic, and (c) environmental factors as well as risk factors, and not on simple safety statements about the end product. The goal of toxicologic experiments should be to provide sufficient data to allow benefit-to-risk judgments about products. Benefit-to-risk judgments need to be made on a broad data base which includes: manufacturing, distribution, and use factors. Safety assessments begin with concerns associated with initial manufacture of raw materials and end with concerns related to disposal of the end products of use. Current experimental design needs to include biopharmaceutic considerations of the dose form, pharmacokinetic aspects, and pharmacodynamic factors as well as pathologic concerns. These factors stress the point that toxicology is a quantitative science because toxicity resides in the dose and dose form and not in the chemical entity.
产品可接受性的最终评估必须基于价值判断,这些价值判断包括:(a) 社会因素、(b) 经济因素、(c) 环境因素以及风险因素,而不是基于关于最终产品的简单安全声明。毒理学实验的目标应该是提供足够的数据,以便对产品进行利弊风险判断。利弊风险判断需要基于广泛的数据库做出,该数据库包括:制造、分销和使用因素。安全评估始于与原材料初始制造相关的问题,止于与使用后最终产品处置相关的问题。当前的实验设计需要包括对剂型的生物药剂学考量、药代动力学方面、药效学因素以及病理学问题。这些因素强调了毒理学是一门定量科学这一点,因为毒性存在于剂量和剂型中,而不是存在于化学实体中。