Rindos A J, Loeb G E, Levitan H
Exp Neurol. 1984 Nov;86(2):208-26. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(84)90182-1.
Though peripheral conduction velocity is widely used to characterize afferent fibers according to somatosensory modality, disagreement exists as to whether or not conduction velocity varies along such an axon's length. Therefore, in this experiment, conduction velocities were measured over very short axonal segments (7.5 to 15 mm) within the posterior tibial nerve, sciatic nerve, and L7 dorsal root, using the method of spike-triggered averaging of neurograms recorded from tripolar electrodes. The conduction velocities for several units were also determined using electrical stimulation, so that the accuracy of the two techniques could be compared. For most units, dorsal root and sciatic nerve conduction velocities were not significantly different; however, they were not tightly correlated. Tibial nerve conduction velocity averaged 86% of that within the sciatic nerve. Variations in sciatic nerve conduction velocity within adjacent axonal segments (9 mm in length) rarely exceeded experimental error. It appears that spike-triggered averaging of signals from tripolar electrodes separated 15 mm or more apart is a more accurate method for measuring conduction velocity than electrical stimulation, which was subject to several large errors.
尽管外周传导速度被广泛用于根据躯体感觉模式来表征传入纤维,但对于传导速度是否会沿着轴突长度发生变化仍存在分歧。因此,在本实验中,我们使用从三极电极记录的神经电图的触发尖峰平均法,测量了胫后神经、坐骨神经和L7背根内非常短的轴突段(7.5至15毫米)的传导速度。还使用电刺激确定了几个单位的传导速度,以便比较这两种技术的准确性。对于大多数单位,背根和坐骨神经的传导速度没有显著差异;然而,它们之间没有紧密的相关性。胫神经传导速度平均为坐骨神经内传导速度的86%。相邻轴突段(长度为9毫米)内坐骨神经传导速度的变化很少超过实验误差。与电刺激相比,似乎从相距15毫米或更远的三极电极进行信号的触发尖峰平均是一种更准确的测量传导速度的方法,电刺激存在几个较大的误差。