• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对获得和未获得参与研究许可的儿童进行比较。

A comparison of children who receive and who do not receive permission to participate in research.

作者信息

Beck S, Collins L, Overholser J, Terry K

出版信息

J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1984 Dec;12(4):573-80. doi: 10.1007/BF00916851.

DOI:10.1007/BF00916851
PMID:6491063
Abstract

In a study examining children's social competence in elementary school settings, the authors had the opportunity to compare children who received parental permission to participate to children who did not receive permission. Results indicated that children who were not involved in the study were more likely to be viewed by teachers as having unsatisfactory relationships with peers than children who were in the study. The present results suggest that investigators begin reporting the number of children who do not participate in a given study and begin examining whether minors who receive parental permission differ on important dimensions from minors who do not receive such permission. Ethical considerations of the present study are discussed.

摘要

在一项考察小学环境中儿童社交能力的研究中,作者有机会将获得家长许可参与研究的儿童与未获得许可的儿童进行比较。结果表明,未参与该研究的儿童比参与研究的儿童更有可能被教师认为与同伴关系不令人满意。目前的结果表明,研究人员应开始报告未参与特定研究的儿童数量,并开始研究获得家长许可的未成年人在重要方面是否与未获得此类许可的未成年人有所不同。本文还讨论了该研究的伦理考量。

相似文献

1
A comparison of children who receive and who do not receive permission to participate in research.对获得和未获得参与研究许可的儿童进行比较。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1984 Dec;12(4):573-80. doi: 10.1007/BF00916851.
2
Potential bias in classroom research: comparison of children with permission and those who do not receive permission to participate.课堂研究中的潜在偏差:获得许可的儿童与未获得参与许可的儿童的比较。
J Clin Child Psychol. 1997 Mar;26(1):36-42. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp2601_4.
3
Take away their hammer: logical and ethical problems in Range and Cotton's "Reports of assent and permission in research with children: illustrations and suggestions.拿走他们的锤子:兰格和科顿的《儿童研究中的同意和许可报告:例证与建议》中的逻辑和伦理问题。
Ethics Behav. 1995;5(4):349-53. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0504_5.
4
Assent and permission rejoinder.同意与许可回应
Ethics Behav. 1995;5(4):345-7. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0504_4.
5
Challenges to obtaining parental permission for child participation in a school-based waterpipe tobacco smoking prevention intervention in Qatar.在卡塔尔,为儿童参与一项基于学校的水烟预防干预措施获取家长许可面临的挑战。
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Sep 30;15:70. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-70.
6
Protection of children's rights to self-determination in research.保护儿童在研究中的自决权。
Ethics Behav. 2003;13(3):237-47. doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB1303_03.
7
Informed consent instead of assent is appropriate in children from the age of twelve: Policy implications of new findings on children's competence to consent to clinical research.对于12岁及以上儿童,适用知情同意而非同意:关于儿童同意参与临床研究能力的新发现的政策影响。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Nov 9;16(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0067-z.
8
The combined effects of teacher-child and peer relationships on children's social-emotional adjustment.师生关系和同伴关系对儿童社会情感适应的综合影响。
J Sch Psychol. 2016 Dec;59:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
9
Reports of assent and permission in research with children: illustrations and suggestions.儿童研究中的同意与许可报告:示例与建议
Ethics Behav. 1995;5(1):49-66. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0501_4.
10
Five points and a lament about Range and Cotton's "Reports of assent and permission in research with children: illustrations and suggestions.关于兰奇和科顿的《儿童研究中的同意与许可报告:例证与建议》的五点及一则 lament(此处“lament”可能有误,推测可能是“评论”之类的词,若按此翻译为“关于兰奇和科顿的《儿童研究中的同意与许可报告:例证与建议》的五点及一则评论” )
Ethics Behav. 1995;5(4):333-44. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0504_3.

引用本文的文献

1
School-based survey participation: oral health and BMI survey of Ohio third graders.基于学校的调查参与:俄亥俄州三年级学生的口腔健康和 BMI 调查。
Matern Child Health J. 2013 Sep;17(7):1208-14. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1107-7.
2
Laboratory lore and research practices in the experimental analysis of human behavior: Subject selection.人类行为实验分析中的实验室知识与研究实践:受试者选择。
Behav Anal. 1988 Spring;11(1):43-50. doi: 10.1007/BF03392454.
3
Parent reports of child behavior problems: bias in participation.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity of teacher nominations of child behavior problems.教师对儿童行为问题提名的有效性。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1980 Sep;8(3):397-404. doi: 10.1007/BF00916383.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1993 Feb;21(1):89-101. doi: 10.1007/BF00910491.