Suppr超能文献

心理健康护理使用情况及成本估计对方法效应的敏感性。

The sensitivity of mental health care use and cost estimates to methods effects.

作者信息

Wells K B, Manning W G, Duan N, Newhouse J P, Ware J E, Benjamin B

出版信息

Med Care. 1984 Sep;22(9):783-8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198409000-00001.

Abstract

The authors determined the sensitivity of estimates of the use and cost of outpatient mental health care to two methods effects: the definition of a mental health visit and strategies for allocating mental health care costs. They use data from the Rand Health Insurance Study, which has a random sample of the nonaged noninstitutionalized civilian population in six United States sites. Estimates of the use of mental health specialists are insensitive to alternative methods. However, estimates of the use and cost of the mental health care delivered by nonpsychiatrist physicians (e.g., internists) are quite sensitive to methods effects. Nevertheless, the cost of care from nonpsychiatrist physicians is so low that the total cost of outpatient mental health care is not meaningfully affected by methods effects.

摘要

作者们确定了门诊心理健康护理使用情况和成本估计对两种方法效应的敏感性

心理健康就诊的定义以及分配心理健康护理成本的策略。他们使用了兰德健康保险研究的数据,该研究对美国六个地区的非老年非机构化平民人口进行了随机抽样。心理健康专家使用情况的估计对替代方法不敏感。然而,非精神科医生(如内科医生)提供的心理健康护理使用情况和成本估计对方法效应相当敏感。尽管如此,非精神科医生的护理成本很低,以至于门诊心理健康护理的总成本并未受到方法效应的显著影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验