Suppr超能文献

对侧颈动脉闭塞是否会影响颈动脉内膜切除术的神经学转归?

Does contralateral carotid occlusion influence neurologic fate of carotid endarterectomy?

作者信息

Sachs S M, Fulenwider J T, Smith R B, Darden W A, Salam A A, Perdue G D

出版信息

Surgery. 1984 Nov;96(5):839-44.

PMID:6495174
Abstract

Divergent opinions regarding operative risks and late prognosis of patients undergoing endarterectomy for carotid stenosis with contralateral carotid occlusion have prompted a review of the experience at Emory University Hospital from Jan. 1, 1978, through Dec. 31, 1982. Fifty-four patients (37 men, 17 women; mean age 63 years) who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with contralateral carotid occlusion (group I) were compared with 410 demographically similar patients without contralateral carotid occlusion (group II) who underwent 503 CEAs during the same interval. CEA indications in group I were the following and were proportionately similar to those of group II: hemispheric transient ischemic attacks, 22 patients; asymptomatic stenosis, 12 patients; nonhemispheric symptoms, 11 patients; previous cerebral infarction, eight patients; and vascular tinnitus, one patient. General anesthesia, routine intraluminal shunting, systemic heparinization, and arteriotomy closure without patch were routinely employed in both groups. Three patients in group I suffered permanent neurologic deficits after operation (5.6%) and two had transient postoperative deficits with complete recovery. Ten patients (2.0%) in group II suffered permanent neurologic deficits and 10 patients experienced transient neurologic events after operation. Neither the transient nor the permanent neurologic deficit rates were statistically different (p greater than 0.05; Fisher exact test) in the two groups. Operative mortality rates for group I and group II were 0% and 0.8%, respectively, and were not significantly different (p greater than 0.10; Fisher exact test). Late postoperative ischemic brain infarctions occurred in two patients in group I (3.8%) and in 13 patients (3.6%) in group II (p greater than 0.10; Fisher exact test). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were virtually identical in both groups, with the majority of deaths caused by cardiac occlusion may undergo CEA with morbidity and mortality rates similar to those without contralateral occlusions. Contralateral carotid occlusion does not necessarily portend an unfavorable early or late prognosis after CEA.

摘要

对于患有对侧颈动脉闭塞的颈动脉狭窄患者行内膜切除术的手术风险和远期预后,存在不同观点,这促使我们回顾了1978年1月1日至1982年12月31日埃默里大学医院的经验。将54例(37例男性,17例女性;平均年龄63岁)接受对侧颈动脉闭塞的颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的患者(I组)与410例在人口统计学上相似、在同一时期接受503次CEA且无对侧颈动脉闭塞的患者(II组)进行比较。I组的CEA指征如下,且与II组成比例相似:半球性短暂性脑缺血发作,22例;无症状性狭窄,12例;非半球性症状,11例;既往脑梗死,8例;血管性耳鸣,1例。两组均常规采用全身麻醉、常规腔内分流、全身肝素化以及不使用补片的动脉切开术闭合。I组有3例患者术后出现永久性神经功能缺损(5.6%),2例术后出现短暂性缺损但完全恢复。II组有10例患者(2.0%)术后出现永久性神经功能缺损,10例患者术后出现短暂性神经事件。两组的短暂性和永久性神经功能缺损率在统计学上均无差异(p>0.05;Fisher精确检验)。I组和II组的手术死亡率分别为0%和0.8%,差异无统计学意义(p>0.10;Fisher精确检验)。I组有2例患者(3.8%)术后出现晚期缺血性脑梗死,II组有13例患者(3.6%)出现(p>0.10;Fisher精确检验)。两组的Kaplan-Meier生存分析基本相同,大多数死亡由心脏原因导致。患有对侧颈动脉闭塞的患者行CEA时,其发病率和死亡率与无对侧闭塞的患者相似。对侧颈动脉闭塞并不一定预示着CEA术后早期或晚期预后不良。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验